Rev. Baldomero Paloay, et al. vs. Rev. Rufina C. Rosendo, et al.
SEC Case No. 3108 • Securities and Exchange Commission • Orders • Nov 11, 1987
Full text
[SEC CASE NO. 3108. November 11, 1987.] REV. BALDOMERO PALOAY, ET AL. , petitioners , vs . REV. RUFINA C. ROSENDO, ET AL. , respondents . O R D E R For failure of the respondents to appear in today's hearing despite receipt of the Order dated September 30, 1987, and upon motion of petitioners' counsel, respondents are hereby declared in default. ScCDET Let the ex-parte reception of evidence for the petitioners be, as it is hereby set on January 29, 1988 at 2:00 o'clock in the afternoon. aDcTHE SO ORDERED. (SGD.) NAPOLEON M. TUMAMAO Hearing Officer
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.