Zoilo S. Soriano, et al. vs. Rolando S. Castillo, et al.
SEC Case No. 3082 (Order) • Securities and Exchange Commission • Orders • Jul 13, 1987
Full text
[SEC CASE NO. 3082. July 13, 1987.] ZOILO S. SORIANO, et al. , complainants , vs . ROLANDO S. CASTILLO, et al. , respondents . O R D E R Submitted for resolution is the motion for reconsideration filed by the respondents as well as the opposition thereto by the complainants. After going over the arguments adduced by the parties, we find no justifiable reason to warrant the reversal of the decision sought to be reconsidered. WHEREFORE, the motion for reconsideration should be, as it is hereby DENIED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED. (SGD.) ALBERTO P. ATAS Hearing Officer
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.