Skip to main content

Dominga Masagca Vda. De Lim, et al. vs. Destilleria Limtuaco & Co., Inc.

SEC Case No. 2525 (Order) • Securities and Exchange Commission • Orders • Jul 21, 1987

Full text

[SEC CASE NO. 2525. July 21, 1987.] DOMINGA MASAGCA VDA. DE LIM, ET AL. , petitioners , vs . DESTILLERIA LIMTUACO & CO., INC. , respondent . O R D E R When this case was called today, only counsel for the respondent appeared notwithstanding the fact that counsel for the petitioners was duly notified. Thereupon, counsel for the respondent manifested that in the last three (3) hearings neither the petitioners nor their counsel appeared. CTHDcS As orally prayed for, counsel for the respondent is given a period of thirty (30) days from today within which to file her memorandum thereto, thereafter this case shall be deemed submitted for decision. SO ORDERED. (SGD.) ENRIQUE L. FLORES, JR. Hearing Officer

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.