Skip to main content

In re New International Environmental Universality, Inc.

SEC Case No. 04-05-58 • Securities and Exchange Commission • Commission En Banc • Jul 18, 2017

Full text

July 18, 2017 SEC CASE NO. 04-05-58 IN THE MATTER OF NEW INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL UNIVERSALITY, INC. DECISION This resolves the Petition 1 filed on 28 April 2005 by the then Compliance and Enforcement Department now known as the Enforcement and Investor Protection Department ( EIPD ) praying that the Commission: REVOKE the Certificate of Filing of Amended Articles of Incorporation dated 11 July 2012 ,erroneously issued in the name of [sic] New International Environmental Univer sity ,Inc.,for the benefit of New International Environmental Univer sality ,Inc.,SEC Registration No. D2001-00879; CANCEL/REJECT the Amendments to Article II (Primary Purpose) of New Universality (SEC Registration No. D2001-00879) filed on 10 July 2002; PURGE/CLEAN the SEC Records pertaining to New International Environmental Universality, Inc.,SEC Registration No. D2001-00879 ,such that all filings containing the erroneous name " New International Environmental Univer sity ,Inc." be removed; and ORDER New International Environmental Univer sality ,Inc.,SEC Registration No. D2001-00879 to submit a new application for Amendments to Article II (Primary Purpose) of its Articles of Incorporation. ISSUE The sole issue 2 is whether the evidence presented warrants a cleaning of the records of SEC Registration No. D2001-00879, such its only corporate name throughout is New International Environmental Univer sality ,Inc. RELEVANT FACTS A. "NEW UNIVER SALITY " HAS IN ITS SEC RECORD THE ERRONEOUS NAME "NEW UNIVER SITY " 1. New International Environmental Universality ("NEW UNIVER SALITY ") ,SEC Registration No. D2001-00879 ,is a domestic corporation, registered via the SEC Davao Extension Office on 3 September 2001. 2. NEW UNIVER SALITY 's SEC records 3 contain a 11 July 2002 Amendment to its Primary Purpose (Article II, Articles of Incorporation) containing the name New International Environmental Univer sity ("NEW UNIVER SITY ") ,even though (a) it clearly indicated, by underlining, that its proposed amendment was limited to its corporate purpose; and (b) it evidently did not propose to become an institution of higher learning, as it did not submit the necessary requirements to become one. Furthermore, its amended purpose had nothing to do with becoming a university. B. THERE IS A SIMILARLY-NAMED, RELATED "OLD UNIVERSALITY," BUT NO SEPARATE "NEW UNIVER SITY " 3. There is only one other entity in the SEC record with a similar name. International Environmental Universality ("OLD UNIVER SALITY ") ,SEC Registration No. D2000-00494 ,is a domestic corporation, registered via the SEC Davao Extension Office on 22 June 2000. 4. Apart from the nearly-identical names, 4 the SEC records reveal that NEW UNIVER SALITY and OLD UNIVER SALITY are related, viz .: "NEW UNIVER SALITY " "OLD UNIVER SALITY " Corporate Name NEW INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL UNIVER SALITY , INC. [Erroneously indicated in the SEC records as " NEW INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL UNIVER SITY " INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL UNIVER SALITY , INC. Place of Registration SEC Davao Extension Office SEC Davao Extension Office Domestic/Foreign Domestic Domestic Stock/Non-Stock Stock Stock Filipino Equity 60% (3 out of 5 SHs Filipino) 57% (4 out of 7 SHs Filipino) Registration Date 3 September 2001 22 June 2000 Registration Number D2001-00879 D2000-00494 Principal Address Hangar 3, IEU Building, Sasa Airport, Davao City Hangar 3, IEU Building, Sasa Airport, Davao City Authorized Capital Stock PHP3,000,000 divided into 30,000 shares with a par value of PHP100 per share PHP1,000,000 divided into 10,000 shares with a par value of PHP100 per share Type of License Primary License only . Granted separate juridical personality but not allowed to sell securities. Primary License only . Primary Purpose To engage in, conduct and maintain the business of water treatment, waste recycling, soil rehabilitation, treatment of organic and inorganic materials, biomolecular separation and construction, metal processing and manufacture of new metals and materials by electron and neutron rearrangement and to conduct research, development and introduction of new innovative engineering and alternative power. [ PROPOSED AMENDMENT in 200 2 : To engage in processing and exportation of metals, minerals and rural products , conduct and maintain the business of water treatment, waste recycling, soil rehabilitation, treatment of organic and inorganic materials, biomolecular separation and construction, metal processing and manufacture of new metals and materials by electron and neutron rearrangement and to conduct research, development and introduction of new innovative engineering and alternative power.] To engage in, conduct and maintain the business of water treatment, waste recycling, soil rehabilitation, treatment of organic and inorganic materials, biomolecular separation and construction, metal processing and manufacture of new metals and materials by electron and neutron rearrangement and to conduct research, development and introduction of new innovative engineering and alternative power. Secondary Purpose *To conduct symposium, seminars and training for practical and theoretical application including research and development of aquaculture, agriculture, earthworks, engineering construction, cold storage, multi-purpose cannery, and the research and development of mineral extraction application procedures [*Added in 200 1 ] [none] Name, Nationality, and Residence of Incorporators and Initial Directors (with interlocking directors shaded) Allan J. Clarke (Australian) 4148 Meadowslon Circle, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA Allan J. Clarke (Australian) 4148 Meadowslon Circle, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA Robert A. Clarke (Australian) 4148 Meadowslen Circle, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA Robert A. Clarke (Australian) 4148 Meadowslen Circle, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA Engr. Reynaldo Hibionada (Filipino) Km. 17 Ilang, Tibungko, Davao City Andrew J. Clarke (Australian) 4148 Meadowslen Circle, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA Ma. Lina Fe D. Clarke (Filipino) Block 11 Lot 5 Akle St., Novatiera, Davao City Raul J. Hollero (Filipino) 236 Summerville Village, Lanang, Davao City Marietta U. Razon (Filipino) 363 Rizal St., Davao City Ruth A. Hollero (Filipino) 236 Summerville Village, Lanang, Davao City Beverly R. Palamara (Filipino) Brgy. W. Aquino, Agdao, Davao City Edmund E. Abug (Filipino) 220 Summerville Village, Lanang, Davao City 5. Apart from the errors in the SEC records of New Univer sality (SEC Registration No. D2001-00879 ), there is no record of a separate entity by the name of New International Environmental University ("New University") . C. THE ERRONEOUS 2002 AMENDMENTS WERE ACCEPTED BY SEC-DAVAO 6. On 10 July 2002, New Univer sality filed an Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation (AOI) with SEC Davao Extension Office (SEC-Davao),specifically its Primary Purpose which was certified 5 by its Directors and underlined 6 in accordance with the Corporation Code. 7 7. The Directors' Certification of "Additional Text for Primary Purpose" and the proposed Amended AOI both contained the erroneous name New Univer sity . 8 This change of name was not underlined, nor was there any certification concerning its amendment. 8. On 11 July 2002, the Amended AOI was approved and a Certificate of Filing 9 issued by SEC Davao Extension Office, signed by its officer-in-charge, Atty. Godofredo M. Duremdes III ("Atty. Duremdes").The Amendments approved and certified by SEC-Davao were (a) the primary purpose, and (b) the corporate name, from New Univer sality to New Univer sity . This approval/certificate caused the error in the SEC records and is the document sought to be purged . 9. On 25 November 2004, the SEC received a letter 10 from a certain Engr. Priscilo B. Paz ("Engr. Paz") requesting for the issuance of a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) against New Univer sality ,owned by a certain Allan J. Clarke, which had been representing itself as New Univer sity in its business dealings in Davao City. Engr. Paz also cited Old Univer sality as another company owned by Clarke. 10. For the purpose of disproving the existence of New Univer sity ,Engr. Paz obtained a Negative Certification dated 9 November 2004 11 from the SEC. This document, however, had the unintended effect of validating the existence of New Univer sality and Old Univer sality . 11. On 21 December 2004, Atty. Duremdes issued a Show Cause Order against Clarke, but no response from the latter was ever filed. D. TO RECTIFY, SEC-DAVAO RECALLED THE DUPLICATE-ORIGINALS IN 2005 12. On 17 January 2005, the [EIPD] issued an Order 12 against Clarke (as Incorporator/Director of New Univer sality ),signed by Dir. Hubert B. Guevara ("Dir. Guevara"),recalling the duplicate-originals of (a) the Certificate of Registration, (b) the full-text of the approved Amended AOI, and (c) any other document that erroneously reflects the word "Univer sity " instead of the correct word "Univer sality ." 13. On 27 January 2005, consistent with the [EIPD] Order, Atty. Duremdes sent a letter 13 to the then SEC Chair, Fe B. Barin, stating that he had already obtained the duplicate-originals 14 of (a) the Certificate of Registration and (b) the full-text of the approved Amended AOI. 14. On 7 March 2005, Engr. Priscilo Paz (using the title "Capt. Priscilo Paz") sent another letter 15 requesting for a CDO against Allan J. Clarke for the use of the corporate name New Univer sity in business. 15. On 11 April 2005, the SEC issued an Order, 16 signed by then General Counsel Vernette Umali-Paco ("GC Paco"),that (a) enjoined New Univer sality ,and any persons connected with it, from using the name New Univer sity ,and (b) ordered New Univer sality to confine its operations to the primary and secondary 17 purposes in its AOI. These purposes do not refer to running an educational institution. E. ENGR. PAZ MADE FURTHER ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD THAT WERE NOT PROVEN 16. On 9 December 2006, Engr. Paz sent another letter 18 to the SEC, alleging fraud not only on New Univer sality and Allan J. Clarke, but also on officials of SEC Davao Extension Office, including Atty. Duremdes. 17. In his letter, Engr. Paz claimed there are two entities, New Univer sality and New Univer sity ,both covered by SEC Registration No. D2001-00879. He attached supposed photocopies of the Certificates of Incorporation, under SEC Registration No. D2001-00879, issued in the names of New Univer sality and New Univer sity . However, these documents were not consistent with the official records . 18. Rather, it is clear that SEC Registration No. D2001-00879 pertains only to New Univer sality .In all the official records, including Engr. Paz's own negative certification, 19 New Univer sality is the only name that appears for that registration number. A search on the current I-View yielded the same result. 20 19. On 17 January 2007, Dir. Guevara sent a Memo 21 to GC Paco, stating inter alia that "There has been no findings of fraud in the said issuance by the Davao Extension Office of the Certificate of Filing Amended Articles of Incorporation dated July 11, 2002." 20. On 1 March 2007, the Company Registration and Monitoring Division (CRMD) issued another Negative Certification 22 against New Univer sity .At the same time, it represented that a similarly named entity, New Univer sality appears under SEC Registration No. 2001-00879. F. THE ERRONEOUS NAME REMAINS IN SEC RECORDS, EVEN IN THE LATEST I-VIEW 21. To reiterate, New Universality is a duly-registered corporation under SEC Registration No. D2001-00879. In 2002, certain documents containing the erroneous name, New Univer sity ,became part of its records. The SEC, upon realizing this error, successfully recalled the duplicate-originals in 2005. The only place where the "New Univer sity " name still appears is in the SEC official records. 22. To date, the erroneous Certificate of Filing and approved Amended AOI remains in the SEC records of New Univer sality .The documents are visible to the public through SEC I-View. 23 DISCUSSION It cannot be gainsaid that any further attempts to investigate fraud do not pose a prejudicial question to the sought-for Cleaning/Purging of the records of New Univer sality ,SEC Registration No. D2001-00879. It is precisely to prevent fraud and/or confusion that we must, with haste, validate and finalize the SEC En Banc Order dated 11 April 2005, enjoining the use of the name "New Univer sity ." The recall of documents and the subsequent injunction against the use of the name New Univer sity in business are clearly correct. Under Section 17 of the Corporation Code ,the SEC "may reject the articles of incorporation or disapprove any amendment thereto if the same is not in compliance with the requirements of this Code" (Emphasis supplied). Section 17 (1) provides specifically that an amendment may be disapproved if it is "not in accordance with the form prescribed herein" as already stated, Section 16 requires that proposed changes must be underscored in the Amended AOI and accompanied by a Certification by the Directors. Furthermore, Section 18 provides that "No corporate name may be allowed by the [SEC] if the proposed name is identical or confusingly similar to that or of any existing corporation or to any other name already protected by law or is patently deceptive, confusing, or contrary to existing laws." The circumstances of this case, affecting both the public and the government, prove that the name New Univer sity is confusingly similar to New Univer sality and the change should not be allowed. Moreover, New Univer sality cannot use New Univer sity because it is not a university. It does not have any license from the Commission on Higher Education or other appropriate agency to operate as such, and it would be "patently deceptive" to present itself to the public as an educational institution by the use of that name. The EIPD may indeed continue investigating New Universality, with or without the assistance of Engr. Paz, for these same or other corporate offenses, but that is a matter for a separate case .Based on the record, it is worth looking into the following grounds for Revocation/Suspension: (1) Non-filing of annual GIS and FS; (2) Possible fraud in certification; (3) Possible ultra vires; and (4) Possible violation of foreign equity rules. As to Old Univer sality ,which Engr. Paz claims is also fraudulent, an investigation would be moot, because it was revoked on 27 June 2006. WHEREFORE ,premises considered, the Petition is hereby partially granted. The CRMD is hereby directed to: REVOKE the Certificate of Filing of Amended Articles of Incorporation dated 11 July 2012 ,erroneously issued in the name of [sic] New International Environmental Univer sity ,Inc.,for the benefit of New International Environmental Univer sality ,Inc.,SEC Registration No. D2001-00879; CANCEL/REJECT the Amendments to Article II (Primary Purpose) of New Univer sality (SEC Registration No. D2001-00879) filed on 10 July 2002; PURGE/CLEAN the SEC Records pertaining to New International Environmental Univer sality ,Inc.,SEC Registration No. D2001-00879 ,such that all filings containing the erroneous name " New International Environmental Univer sity, Inc." be removed; and ORDER New International Environmental Univer sality ,Inc.,SEC Registration No. D2001-00879 to submit a new application for Amendments to Article II (Primary Purpose) of its Articles of Incorporation. The EIPD is hereby directed to: CONDUCT AN INVESTIGATION into New International Environmental Univer sality ,Inc.,SEC Registration No. D2001-00879 ,for possible violations of laws within the mandate of the Commission; and INITIATE/FILE the appropriate cases. SO ORDERED. Pasay City, Philippines, July 18, 2017. (SGD.) TERESITA J. HERBOSA Chairperson (SGD.) ANTONIETA F. IBE Commissioner (SGD.) EPHYRO LUIS B. AMATONG Commissioner (SGD.) BLAS JAMES G. VITERBO Commissioner On Leave EMILIO B. AQUINO Commissioner Footnotes 1. Dated 18 April 2005. 2. Much delay has resulted from subsequent investigations that are not prejudicial to the determination of this case. 3. Last accessed on SEC I-View, 26 March 2017. 4. Note that much confusion has resulted from focusing on the word "Universality" that is shared by these two entities. This can be avoided by likewise focusing on the first word, "New," that is only part of the name of one entity (New Univer sality ).It was only New Universality that was erroneously re-named (as New Univer sity ) in the SEC records. 5. Directors' Certification of the proposed amendment was attached as Annex A of Petition . 6. Amended AOI (with Primary Purpose underlined) was attached as Annex B of Petition . 7. 2nd Sentence, 2nd Paragraph of Section 16, Corporation Code :"x x x Such articles, as amended shall be indicated by underscoring the change or changes made x x x." 8. Supra ,Notes 5 and 6. 9. The Certificate of Filing Amended AOI was attached as Annex C of the Petition . 10. Engr. Paz's 200 4 Letter to the SEC was attached as Annex D of the Petition . 11. The Negative Certification against New Univer sity as attached as Annex D-1 of the Petition . 12. The 17 January 2005 [EIPD] Order to Recall was attached as Annex F-1 of the Petition . 13. Atty. Duremdes' Letter dated 27 January 2005 was attached as Annex G of the Petition . 14. The duplicate-originals of the Certificate and AOI were attached as Annex H of the Petition . 15. Engr. Paz's 200 5 Letter to the SEC was attached as Annex I of the Petition . 16. The Order of the SEC En Banc dated 11 April 2005 was attached as Annex J-1 of the Petition . 17. Added in a 2001 amendment (where there was no error in the corporate name). 18. Engr. Paz's 200 6 Letter to the SEC is attached here as Appendix 1 . 19. Supra ,Note 11. 20. Supra ,Note 3. 21. Dir. Guevara's Memo to GC Paco is attached here as Appendix 2 . 22. The CRMD negative Certification dated 1 March 2007 is attached here as Appendix 3 . 23. Supra ,note 3.

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.