Skip to main content

ITAD Ruling No. 118-04

ITAD Ruling No. 118-04 • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Issuances • International Tax Affairs Division (ITAD) Rulings • Oct 27, 2004

Full text

October 27, 2004 ITAD RULING NO. 118-04 Article 10, Philippines-Sweden tax treaty BIR Ruling No. 070-81 AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals (Phils.), Inc . AstraZeneca Building Km 14 South Superhighway Paraaque City 1700 Philippines Attention: Josephine L. Carpio Finance Director Gentlemen : This refers to your application for relief from double taxation dated July 21, 2404, requesting confirmation of your opinion that the dividends paid by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals (Phils.), Inc. (APPI) to AstraZeneca AB (AAB) are subject to the preferential tax rate of 15% pursuant to Article 10 of the Philippines-Sweden tax treaty. It is represented that AAB is a nonresident foreign corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Sweden with address at S-151 85 Sodertalje, Sweden; that it is not registered either as a corporation or a partnership licensed to do business in the Philippines per certification dated July 13, 2004 issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission; that APPI is a corporation organized and existing under laws of the Philippines, with office address at AstraZeneca Building, Km. 14 South Superhighway, Paraaque, Metro Manila; that as of December 31, 2003, AAB owns and holds Two Million Ninety Four Thousand Nine Hundred Seventy (2,094,970) shares in APPI equivalent to a total value of Two Hundred Nine Million Four Hundred Ninety Seven Thousand (209,497,000), representing approximately 99.98% of the total outstanding and issued shares of APPI; and that on June 17, 2004, the Board of Directors of APPI declared cash dividends in the aggregate amount of One Hundred Fifty Million Pesos (Ph150,000,000.00) to all stockholders of record as of December 31, 2003 to be distributed in proportion to their respective stockholdings, payable on or before December 31, 2004. cSaATC In reply, please be informed that Article 10 of the Philippines-Sweden tax treaty provides as follows, viz : "Article 10 "DIVIDENDS "1. Dividends paid by a company which is a resident of a Contracting State to a resident of the other Contracting State may be taxed in that other State. "2. However, such dividends may also be taxed in the State of which the company paying the dividends is a resident and according to the laws of that State, but if the beneficial owner of the dividends is a resident of the other Contracting State, the tax so charged shall not exceed: a) 10 percent of the gross amount of the dividends if the beneficial owner is a company (excluding partnerships) which holds directly at least 25 per cent of the capital of the paying company; b) 15 percent of the gross amount of the dividends in all other cases. This paragraph shall not affect the taxation of the company in respect of the profits out of which the dividends are paid. "3. The term "dividends" as used in this Article means income from shares or other rights, not being debt-claims, participating in profits, as well as income from other corporate rights which is subjected to the same taxation treatment as income from shares by the taxation law of the State of which the company making the distribution is a resident. "xxx xxx xxx" Based on the above-cited provisions, the 10% preferential tax rate on dividends shall apply whenever the recipient, who is the beneficial owner of the dividends, owns at least 25% of the capital of the paying company. In all other cases, the 15% preferential tax rate shall apply. Such being the case and considering that AAB holds approximately 99.98% of the capital of APPI, this Office is of the opinion and so holds that the dividend payments by APPI to AAB shall be subject to the preferential tax rate of 10% of the gross amount of dividends, pursuant to Article 10(2)(a) of the Philippines-Sweden tax treaty. (BIR Ruling No. 070-81 dated April 8, 1981) This ruling is issued on the basis of the facts as represented. However, if upon investigation, it shall be disclosed that the facts are different, then this ruling shall be without force and effect insofar as the herein parties are concerned. DaAISH Very truly yours, Commissioner of Internal Revenue By: (SGD.) MILAGROS V. REGALADO Assistant Commissioner Legal Service

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.