Skip to main content

ITAD BIR Ruling No. 358-12

ITAD BIR Ruling No. 358-12 • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Issuances • International Tax Affairs Division (ITAD) Rulings • Oct 18, 2012

Full text

October 18, 2012 ITAD BIR RULING NO. 358-12 Article 12 (Royalties) Philippines-France tax treaty Sanofi-Aventis Philippines, Inc. 3rd Floor, Feliza Building 108 V.A. Rufino Street Legaspi Village, Makati City Attention: Gladys M. Solidum Compliance Manager Gentlemen : This refers to your tax treaty relief application ("TTRA") filed on April 27, 2009 requesting confirmation that royalties paid by Sanofi-Aventis Philippines, Inc. ("Sanofi-Aventis Philippines") (formerly Aventis Pharma, Inc. ) to Sanofi Winthrop Industries ("Sanofi Winthrop") are subject to income tax at the rate of 15 percent pursuant to the Convention between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Government of the French Republic for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income ("Philippines-France tax treaty"). 1 Facts Sanofi Winthrop is a foreign corporation in France based on its Articles of Incorporation. Sanofi Winthrop is located at 82 Avenue Raspail, Gentilly, France. It is not registered as a corporation or partnership in the Philippines based on the Certification of Non-Registration of Corporation/Partnership issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2009. On the other hand, Sanofi-Aventis Philippines is a domestic corporation located at 3rd Floor, Feliza Building, 108 V.A. Rufino Street, Legaspi Village, Makati City, Philippines. On November 2, 2004, Sanofi-Aventis Philippines and Sanofi Winthrop entered into a Trademark License Agreement where Sanofi Winthrop granted Sanofi-Aventis Philippines an exclusive license to use in the Philippines, the trademarks, trade names, and other applications therefor, bearing the word Sanofi-Aventis as used in the manufacture, promotion, distribution and sale of the following pharmaceutical and personal care products: (1) Lactacyd, (2) Aralen, (3) Ercefuryl, (4) Gardan, (5) Afaxin , (6) Wintomylon , and (7) Coldrex . In consideration, Sanofi-Aventis Philippines will pay royalties to Sanofi Winthrop equivalent to 3 percent of its net sales of the products. The royalties are computed quarterly and payable fifteen days after the end of each quarter. The Agreement took effect on January 1, 2004 and will remain in effect for a period of ten years or until December 31, 2013. The parties may then renew the term of the Agreement for additional period or periods of five years. The name Sanofi-Aventis is registered with the Intellectual Property Office under Certificate of Registration No. 4-2004-009449 issued on August 24, 2007, valid from November 27, 2006 to November 27, 2016. cCAIES Ruling Relative thereto, please be informed that under Section III (2) of Revenue Memorandum Order No. 1-00 (Procedures for Processing Tax Treaty Relief Application) ("RMO 1-2000") , any availment of tax treaty relief (exemption from income tax or reduction of tax) shall be preceded by an application filed at the International Tax Affairs Division ("ITAD") of this Bureau at least fifteen days before the intended transaction or payment of income, thus: " III. Policies: In order to achieve the above-mentioned objectives, the following policies shall be observed: xxx xxx xxx 2. Any availment of the tax treaty relief shall be preceded by an application by filing BIR Form No. 0901 (Application for Relief from Double Taxation) with ITAD at least 15 days before the transaction i.e., payment of dividends, royalties, etc., accompanied by supporting documents justifying the relief . . . " (Emphasis ours) This condition is emphasized by the Court of Tax Appeals in Mirant (Philippines) Operations Corporation vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.T.A. Case No. 6382 dated June 7, 2005) where it ruled: " However, it must be remembered that a foreign corporation wishing to avail of the benefits of the tax treaty should invoke the provisions of the tax treaty and prove that indeed the provisions of the tax treaty applies to it, before the benefits may be extended to such corporation . In other words, a resident or non-resident foreign corporation shall be taxed according to the provisions of the National Internal Revenue Code, unless it is shown that the treaty provisions apply to the said corporation, and that, in cases the same are applicable, the option to avail of the tax benefits under the tax treaty has been successfully invoked. Under Revenue Memorandum Order 01-2000 of the Bureau of Internal Revenue, it is provided that the availment of a tax treaty provision must be preceded by an application for a tax treaty relief with its International Tax Affairs Division (ITAD). This is to prevent any erroneous interpretation and/or application of the treaty provisions with which the Philippines is a signatory to. The implementation of the said Revenue Memorandum Order is in harmony with the objectives of the contracting state to ensure that the granting of the benefits under the tax treaties are enjoyed by the persons or corporations duly entitled to the same . aHIDAE The Court notes that nowhere in the records of the case was it shown that petitioner indeed took the liberty of properly observing the provisions of the said order. Petitioner quotes various BIR, as well as ITAD, Rulings issued to several foreign corporations seeking for a tax relief from the office of the respondent. However, not any one of these rulings pertains to the petitioner. It must be stressed that BIR rulings are issued based on the facts and circumstances surrounding particular issue/issues in question and are resolved on a case-to-case basis. It would be thus erroneous to invoke the ruling of the respondent in specific cases, which have no bearing to the case of petitioner. " (Emphasis ours) This decision is upheld by the Supreme Court in Resolution G.R. No. 168531 dated February 18, 2008. Furthermore, the necessary requirement laid down in RMO 1-2000 is reiterated in subsequent rulings of the Court of Tax Appeals: Deutsche Bank AG Manila Branch vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.T.A. Case No. EB 456 dated May 29, 2009), CBK Power Company Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.T.A. Case Nos. 6699, 6844 and 7166 dated March 29, 2010) and Manila North Tollways Corporation vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.T.A. Case No. 7864 dated April 12, 2011) . In view of the foregoing, since the Agreement that gives rise to the royalties has been in effect since January 1, 2004 , and the TTRA for this purpose was filed only on April 27, 2009 , this Office hereby DENIES relief on all royalties paid by Sanofi-Aventis Philippines to Sanofi Winthrop before May 12, 2009 , pursuant to Section III (2) of RMO 1-2000. Accordingly, said royalties shall be subject to income tax under Section 28 (B) (1) of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997 (" Tax Code "), as amended, to wit: "SEC. 28. Rates of Income Tax on Foreign Corporations . xxx xxx xxx (B) Tax on Nonresident Foreign Corporation . (1) In General. Except as otherwise provided in this Code, a foreign corporation not engaged in trade or business in the Philippines shall pay a tax equal to thirty-five percent (35%) of the gross income received during each taxable year from all sources within the Philippines, such as interests, dividends, rents, royalties, salaries, premiums (except reinsurance premiums), annuities, emoluments or other fixed or determinable annual, periodic or casual gains, profits and income, and capital gains, except capital gains subject to tax under subparagraph 5(c) and (d) above: Provided, That effective January 1, 2009, the rate of income tax shall be thirty percent (30%)." EAIcCS On the other hand, the royalties paid to Sanofi Winthrop on May 12, 2009 and thereafter are subject to a reduced rate of income tax under Article 12 of the amended Philippines-France tax treaty, which provides: "Article 12 ROYALTIES 1. Royalties arising in a Contracting State and paid to a resident of the other Contracting State may be taxed in that other State. 2. However, such royalties may also be taxed in the Contracting State in which they arise and according to the laws of that State, but if the beneficial owner of the royalties is a resident of the other Contracting State, the tax so charged shall not exceed 15 percent of the gross amount of the royalties. 3. The term 'royalties' as used in this Article means payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright of literary, artistic or scientific work including cinematographic films and works recorded for broadcasting or television, any patent, trade mark, design or model, plan, secret formula or process, or for the use of, or the right to use, industrial, commercial, or scientific equipment, or for information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience." Under Article 12, royalties arising in the Philippines and paid to a resident of France may be taxed in the Philippines at a rate not to exceed 15 percent in all cases. The term royalties means payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright of literary, artistic or scientific work including cinematographic films and works recorded for broadcasting or television, any patent, trade mark, design or model, plan, secret formula or process, or for the use of, or the right to use, industrial, commercial, or scientific equipment, or for information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience. Accordingly, since Sanofi Winthrop is a resident of France by reason of its incorporation therein, such royalties paid to it by Sanofi-Aventis Philippines on May 12, 2009 and thereafter , for the use of the Sanofi-Aventis trademark affixed in certain pharmaceutical and personal care products manufactured and sold in the Philippines, shall be subject to income tax at the rate of 15 percent , pursuant to paragraph 2, Article 12 of the Philippines-France tax treaty. IaHCAD Furthermore, under Section 108 (A) of the Tax Code, the said royalties for the use trademark are subject to value-added tax ("VAT"), to wit: "SEC. 108. Value-added Tax on Sale of Services and Use or Lease of Properties . (A) Rate and Base of Tax . There shall be levied, assessed and collected, a value-added tax equivalent to ten percent (10%) of gross receipts derived from the sale or exchange of services, including the use or lease of properties selling price or gross value in money of the goods or properties sold, bartered or exchanged, such tax to be paid by the seller or transferor: Provided, that the President, upon the recommendation of the Secretary of Finance, shall, effective January 1, 2006, 2 raise the rate of value-added tax to twelve percent (12%) . . ." Accordingly, Sanofi-Aventis Philippines shall withhold VAT on the royalties at the rate of 10 percent before February 1, 2006, and 12 percent beginning February 1, 2006 and thereafter, before remitting them to Sanofi Winthrop . Sanofi-Aventis Philippines shall use BIR Form No. 1600 (Monthly Remittance Return of Value-Added Tax and Other Percentage Taxes Withheld). If it is a VAT-registered taxpayer, the duly filed BIR Form No. 1600 and its accompanying proof of payment shall serve as documentary substantiation for Sanofi-Aventis Philippines ' claim of input tax on the royalties; otherwise, it may treat the VAT as an asset or expense, whichever is applicable. VAT withheld shall be remitted within ten days following the end of the month the withholding was made. 3 This ruling is issued on the basis of the facts as represented. However, if upon investigation it shall be disclosed that the actual facts are different, then this ruling shall be without force and effect insofar as the herein parties are concerned. Very truly yours, (SGD.) KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES Commissioner of Internal Revenue Footnotes 1. As amended by the Protocol to the Tax Convention between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines and the Government of the French Republic Signed on January 9, 1976 effective January 1, 1998 . 2. The VAT rate is increased to twelve percent on February 1, 2006, in accordance with the Memorandum of the Executive Secretary to the Secretary of Finance dated January 31, 2006, as circularized by Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 7-2006 (Publishing the Full Text of the Memorandum from Executive Secretary Eduardo R. Ermita dated January 31, 2006 Approving the Recommendation of the Secretary of Finance to Increase the Value Added Tax Rate from Ten Percent to Twelve Percent) dated January 31, 2006. 3. Pursuant to Section 4.112-2 of Revenue Regulations No. 16-2005 (Consolidated Value-Added Tax Regulations of 2005) , as amended by Revenue Regulations No. 4-2007 (Amending Certain Provisions of Revenue Regulations No. 16-2005, As Amended, Otherwise Known as the Consolidated Value-Added Tax Regulations of 2005) , which provides: "SEC. 4.114-2. Withholding of VAT on Government Money Payments and Payments to Non-Residents . xxx xxx xxx (b) The government or any of its political subdivisions, instrumentalities or agencies including GOCCs, as well as private corporation, individuals, estates and trust, whether large or non-large taxpayers, shall withhold twelve percent (12%) VAT, starting February 1, 2006, with respect to the following payments: (1) Lease or use of properties or property rights owned by non-residents; and (2) Services rendered to local insurance companies with respect to reinsurance premiums payable to non-residents; and (3) Other services rendered in the Philippines by non-residents. In remitting VAT withheld, the withholding agent shall use BIR Form No. 1600 Remittance Return of VAT and Other Percentage Taxes Withheld. VAT withheld and paid for the non-resident recipient (remitted using BIR Form No. 1600), which VAT is passed on to the resident withholding agent by the non-resident recipient of the income, may be claimed as input tax by said VAT-registered withholding agent upon filing his own VAT Return, subject to the rule on allocation of input tax among taxable sales, zero-rated sales and exempt sales. The duly filed BIR Form No. 1600 is the proof or documentary substantiation for the claimed input tax or input VAT. Nonetheless, if the resident withholding agent is a non-VAT taxpayer, said passed-on VAT by the non-resident recipient of the income, evidenced by the duly filed BIR Form No. 1600, shall form part of the cost of purchased services, which may be treated either as an 'asset' or 'expense', whichever is applicable, of the resident withholding agent. VAT withheld under this Section shall be remitted within ten (10) days following the end of the month the withholding was made."

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.