ITAD BIR Ruling No. 206-12
ITAD BIR Ruling No. 206-12 • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Issuances • International Tax Affairs Division (ITAD) Rulings • May 28, 2012
Full text
May 28, 2012 ITAD BIR RULING NO. 206-12 Ibiden Philippines, Inc. First Philippine Industrial Park Barangay Sta. Anastacia Sto. Tomas, Batangas Attention: Shinichi Sugamata Group Manager Gentlemen : This refers to your tax treaty relief application ("TTRA") filed on April 29, 2010 requesting confirmation that service fee paid by Ibiden Philippines, Inc. ("Ibiden") to EMD Company Ltd. ("EMD") is exempt from income tax pursuant to the Convention between the Republic of the Philippines and Japan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income. EMD is a foreign corporation organized and existing under the laws of Japan located at 8-23-2 Marunouchi, Takehana-cho, Hashima City, Gifu, Japan. It is not registered as a corporation or partnership in the Philippines. On the other hand, Ibiden is a domestic corporation located at First Philippine Industrial Park, Barangay Sta. Anastacia, Sto. Tomas, Batangas, Philippines. On February 8, 2010, Ibiden and EMD entered into two Individual Outsourcing Agreements where EMD agreed to provide services to Ibiden in the Philippines relating to the design, management, launching and improvement of certain equipment to be utilized by Ibiden. The Agreements actually covered services rendered by EMD to Ibiden in 2009; the first Agreement had a term from April 20 to December 5, 2009 and the second Agreement from October 28 to December 25, 2009. In consideration, Ibiden will pay service fee to EMD every month. The service fee for services furnished in a particular month is payable in the following month. Relative thereto, please be informed that under Section III (2) of Revenue Memorandum Order No. 1-00 (Procedures for Processing Tax Treaty Relief Application) ("RMO 1-2000"), any availment of tax treaty relief (exemption from income tax or reduction of tax) shall be preceded by an application filed at the International Tax Affairs Division ("ITAD") of this Bureau at least fifteen days before the intended transaction or payment of income, thus: "III. Policies: In order to achieve the above-mentioned objectives, the following policies shall be observed: xxx xxx xxx 2. Any availment of the tax treaty relief shall be preceded by an application by filing BIR Form No. 0901 (Application for Relief from Double Taxation) with ITAD at least 15 days before the transaction i.e., payment of dividends, royalties, etc., accompanied by supporting documents justifying the relief. . ." (Emphasis ours) This condition is emphasized by the Court of Tax Appeals in Mirant (Philippines) Operations Corporation vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.T.A. Case No. 6382 dated June 7, 2005) where it ruled: " However, it must be remembered that a foreign corporation wishing to avail of the benefits of the tax treaty should invoke the provisions of the tax treaty and prove that indeed the provisions of the tax treaty applies to it, before the benefits may be extended to such corporation. In other words, a resident or non-resident foreign corporation shall be taxed according to the provisions of the National Internal Revenue Code, unless it is shown that the treaty provisions apply to the said corporation, and that, in cases the same are applicable, the option to avail of the tax benefits under the tax treaty has been successfully invoked. EcTIDA Under Revenue Memorandum Order 01-2000 of the Bureau of Internal Revenue, it is provided that the availment of a tax treaty provision must be preceded by an application for a tax treaty relief with its International Tax Affairs Division (ITAD). This is to prevent any erroneous interpretation and/or application of the treaty provisions with which the Philippines is a signatory to. The implementation of the said Revenue Memorandum Order is in harmony with the objectives of the contracting state to ensure that the granting of the benefits under the tax treaties are enjoyed by the persons or corporations duly entitled to the same. The Court notes that nowhere in the records of the case was it shown that petitioner indeed took the liberty of properly observing the provisions of the said order. Petitioner quotes various BIR, as well as ITAD, Rulings issued to several foreign corporations seeking for a tax relief from the office of the respondent. However, not any one of these rulings pertains to the petitioner. It must be stressed that BIR rulings are issued based on the facts and circumstances surrounding particular issue/issues in question and are resolved on a case-to-case basis. It would be thus erroneous to invoke the ruling of the respondent in specific cases, which have no bearing to the case of petitioner." (Emphasis ours) This decision of the Court of Tax Appeals is upheld by the Supreme Court in Resolution G.R. No. 168531 on February 18, 2008. Furthermore, the requirement laid down in RMO 1-2000 is reiterated in subsequent rulings of the Court of Tax Appeals: Deutsche Bank AG Manila Branch vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.T.A. Case No. EB 456 dated May 29, 2009), CBK Power Company Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.T.A. Case Nos. 6699, 6844 and 7166 dated March 29, 2010) and Manila North Tollways Corporation vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.T.A. Case No. 7864 dated April 12, 2011). In view of the foregoing, since the subject TTRA was filed on April 29, 2010, and the Individual Outsourcing Agreements that give rise to the service fee was in effect only in 2009 so that the last service fee for services rendered in December 2009 was supposedly paid in January 2010, this Office hereby DENIES relief on all service fees paid by Ibiden to EMD for having the TTRA filed beyond the period of at least fifteen days before the intended payment of income as required in Section III (2) of RMO 1-2000. Accordingly, said fees shall be subject to income tax at the rate of 30 percent under Section 28 (B) (1) of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as amended, to wit: "SEC. 28. Rates of Income Tax on Foreign Corporations. xxx xxx xxx (B) Tax on Nonresident Foreign Corporation. (1) In General. Except as otherwise provided in this Code, a foreign corporation not engaged in trade or business in the Philippines shall pay a tax equal to thirty-five percent (35%) of the gross income received during each taxable year from all sources within the Philippines, such as interests, dividends, rents, royalties, salaries, premiums (except reinsurance premiums), annuities, emoluments or other fixed or determinable annual, periodic or casual gains, profits and income, and capital gains, except capital gains subject to tax under subparagraph 5(c) and (d) above: Provided, That effective January 1, 2009, the rate of income tax shall be thirty percent (30%)." Please be guided accordingly. EADCHS Very truly yours, (SGD.) KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.