ITAD BIR Ruling No. 123-14
ITAD BIR Ruling No. 123-14 • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Issuances • International Tax Affairs Division (ITAD) Rulings • Jul 21, 2014
Full text
July 21, 2014 ITAD BIR RULING NO. 123-14 Article 10, Philippines-Japan tax treaty Sanyo Plastic Philippines, Inc. 110 East Main Ave., SEPZ, Laguna Technopark Bian, Laguna Attention: Maria Modesta E. Quilantang Finance Assistant Manager Gentlemen : This refers to your tax treaty relief application dated April 17, 2013 requesting for confirmation that dividends paid by Sanyo Plastic Philippines, Inc. ("SPPI") to Sanyo Plastic Industrial Co., Ltd. ("SPICL") are subject to a preferential tax rate of 10 percent pursuant to the Convention between the Republic of the Philippines and Japan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income as amended by a Protocol 1 ("Philippines-Japan tax treaty"). It is represented that SPICL is a foreign corporation organized and existing under the laws of Japan with its principal office address at 1 F Maison Villa Unoki, 3-11-3 Unoki, Ota-ku, Tokyo, Japan based on its Residence Certificate issued by the District Director of Yukigaya Tax Office on April 2, 2013; that SPICL is not registered as a corporation or partnership in the Philippines based on the Certification issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 16, 2013; and that on the other hand, SPPI is a domestic corporation with principal address at the 110 East Main Ave., SEPZ, Laguna Technopark, Bian, Laguna. It is further represented that on March 25, 2013 the Board of Directors of SPPI declared cash dividends in the amount of Nine Million Pesos (PhP9,000,000.00) payable to all stockholders of record as of March 30, 2013, payable on or before April 19, 2013 based on the Certificate issued by the Corporate Secretary of SPPI on April 11, 2013; that SPICL owns Thirty Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Forty-Seven (38,747) shares of stock or 43.713% of the entire stockholdings of SPPI with a total par value of Thirty Eight Million Seven Hundred Forty Seven Thousand Pesos (PhP38,747,000.00) computed at One Thousand Pesos (PhP1,000.00) per share, acquired on March 10, 2005, based on the Certification issued by the Corporate Secretary of SPPI on April 11, 2013; and that based on a certification issued by RCBC Laguna Technopark Branch, such dividends was remitted to SPICL on April 19, 2013. DSETac In reply, please be informed that Section 28 (B) (1) of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997 (" Tax Code "), as amended, provides that dividends paid to SPICL, being a foreign corporation not engaged in trade or business in the Philippines, are subject to income tax at the rate 30 percent, thus: "Section 28. Rates of Income Tax on Foreign Corporations. xxx xxx xxx (B) Tax on Nonresident Foreign Corporation. (1) In General. Except as otherwise provided in this Code, a foreign corporation not engaged in trade or business in the Philippines shall pay a tax equal to thirty-five percent (35%) of the gross income received during each taxable year from all sources within the Philippines, such as . . ., dividends, . . .: Provided, That effective January 1, 2009, the rate of income tax shall be thirty percent (30%). xxx xxx xxx" However, Section 32 (B) (5) of the Code provides that such dividends may be exempt from income tax or subject to a reduced rate to the extent required by any treaty obligation on the Philippines, thus: "Section 32. Gross Income. xxx xxx xxx (B) Exclusions from Gross Income. The following items shall not be included in gross income and shall be exempt from taxation under this Title: xxx xxx xxx (5) Income Exempt under Treaty. Income of any kind, to the extent required by any treaty obligation binding upon the Government of the Philippines. cDSAEI xxx xxx xxx" In this particular case, you invoke the Philippines-Japan tax treaty. Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, Article 10 thereof provide: "Article 10 1. Dividends paid by a company which is a resident of a Contracting State to a resident of the other Contracting State may be taxed in that other Contracting State. 2. However, such dividends may also be taxed in the Contracting State of which the company paying the dividends is a resident, and according to the laws of that Contracting State, but if the recipient is the beneficial owner of the dividends the tax so charged shall not exceed: a) 10 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends if the beneficial owner is a company which holds directly at least 25 per cent either of the voting shares of the company paying the dividends or of the total shares issued by that company during the period of six months immediately preceding the date of payment of the dividends ; b) 25 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends in all other cases. The provisions of this paragraph shall not affect the taxation of the company in respect of the profits out of which the dividends are paid. 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (2), the amount of tax imposed by the Philippines on the dividends paid by a company, being a resident of the Philippines, registered with the Board of Investments and engaged in preferred pioneer areas of investment under the investment incentives laws of the Philippines to a resident of Japan, who is the beneficial owner of the dividends, shall not exceed 10 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends. xxx xxx xxx" Based on the aforequoted provisions, dividends arising in the Philippines and paid to a resident of Japan may be taxed in the Philippines at a rate not to exceed: (a) 10 percent if the company recipient of the dividends holds directly at least 25 percent of the voting shares or the total shares of the company paying the dividends for a period of six months immediately preceding the date of payment of the dividends; (b) 10 percent if the dividends are paid by a domestic company registered with the Board of Investments and engaged in preferred pioneer areas of investment under the incentive laws of the Philippines; and (c) 25 percent in all other cases. TIcAaH This being the case, and considering that SPICL holds 43.713 percent of the total shares of SPPI during a period of six months immediately preceding the date of payment of the dividends or since March 10, 2005, this Office is of the opinion and so holds that such dividends paid by SPPI to SPICL are subject to income tax at a preferential rate of 10 percent based on the gross amount thereof, pursuant to paragraph 2 (a), Article 10 of the Philippines-Japan tax treaty. This ruling is issued on the basis of the facts as represented. However, if upon investigation, it shall be disclosed that the actual facts are different, then this ruling shall be without force and effect insofar as the herein parties are concerned. Very truly yours, (SGD.) KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES Commissioner of Internal Revenue Footnotes 1. Protocol Amending the Convention between the Republic of the Philippines and Japan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income effective January 1, 2009.
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.