Skip to main content

ITAD BIR Ruling No. 098-15

ITAD BIR Ruling No. 098-15 • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Issuances • International Tax Affairs Division (ITAD) Rulings • Mar 27, 2015

Full text

March 27, 2015 ITAD BIR RULING NO. 098-15 Article 10, Philippines-Netherlands Tax Treaty San Roque Power Corporation 36th/F The Enterprise Center 6760 Ayala Avenue Makati City Attention: Ryukichi Kawaguchi Authorized Representative Gentlemen : This refers to your Tax Treaty Relief Application filed on September 16, 2013, on behalf of KPIC NETHERLANDS B.V. ("KPIC"), requesting confirmation that the dividend paid by SAN ROQUE POWER CORPORATION ("San Roque") to KPIC is subject to 10 percent preferential tax rate pursuant to the Convention between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Republic of the Philippines for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income ("Philippines-Netherlands tax treaty") . It is represented that KPIC, with address at Herikerbergweg 238, 1101 CM Amsterdam, the Netherlands, is a resident of the Netherlands within the meaning of Article 4 of the Philippines-Netherlands tax treaty based on the Declaration of Residence issued by the Director General of the Tax and Customs Administration of the Netherlands dated July 3, 2013; that based on its Deed of Amendment of the Articles of Association, KPIC is company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands with authorized capital of ninety thousand euros (EUR90,000), divided into ninety thousand (90,000) shares of one euro (EUR1.00) each; that KPIC is not registered as a corporation or as a partnership in the Philippines, as shown in the Certification of Non-Registration of Company issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 7, 2013; on the other hand, San Roque is a domestic corporation duly organized and existing under Philippine laws, located at the Brgy. San Roque, San Miguel, Pangasinan; and that, it is registered with the Board of Investments under Certificate of Registration No. 97-356. It is also represented that on September 16, 2013, the Board of Directors of San Roque declared a cash dividend of US Dollar 15.48962 per share (or a total of U.S. Dollars 29,187,469 in favor of all stockholders of record as of September 16, 2013 on the basis of the outstanding capital stock held by the stockholders; that KPIC is the owner of 1,000 common shares (including four common shares registered in the name of KPIC's four nominee directors) and 941,162 Series A preferred shares, amounting to Php3,525,000.00 and Php3,317,596,050.00, respectively, representing 50% ownership in San Roque ; that these shares were acquired by KPIC on various dates from June 1, 2004, June 20, 2008 and June 29, 2009 through assignment and purchase; and that the dividend was remitted by San Roque to KPIC on September 17, 2013 per Sworn Certification issued by Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation. TDCcAE It is finally represented, based on the Sworn Statement by San Roque on August 2, 2013 that the transaction subject of the request for ruling is not under investigation, on-going audit, administrative protest, claim for refund or issuance of a tax credit certificate, collection proceedings, or judicial appeal of the taxpayer/s involved. In reply, please be informed that Section 28 (B) (1) of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997 ("Tax Code of 1997"), as amended, applies, in general, to dividends derived in the Philippines by a nonresident foreign corporation. It provides: "Section 28. Rates of Income Tax on Foreign Corporations . xxx xxx xxx (B) Tax on Nonresident Foreign Corporation . (1) In General. Except as otherwise provided in this Code, a foreign corporation not engaged in trade or business in the Philippines shall pay a tax equal to thirty-five percent (35%) of the gross income received during each taxable year from all sources within the Philippines, such as . . ., dividends, . . .: Provided, That effective January 1, 2009, the rate of income tax shall be thirty percent (30%). xxx xxx xxx" However, Section 32 (B) (5) of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended, provides that any income may be exempt from income tax to the extent required by any treaty obligation binding upon the Philippine Government, thus: "Section 32. Gross Income . xxx xxx xxx (B) Exclusions from Gross Income . The following items shall not be included in gross income and shall be exempt from taxation under this Title: xxx xxx xxx (5) Income Exempt under Treaty. Income of any kind, to the extent required by any treaty obligation binding upon the Government of the Philippines. xxx xxx xxx" Thus, Article 10 of the Philippines-Netherlands tax treaty which you invoke, may apply to the instant case. It provides: "Article 10 Dividends 1. Dividends paid by a company which is a resident of one of the States to a resident of the other State may be taxed in that other State. 2. However, such dividends may also be taxed in the State of which the company paying the dividends is a resident and according to the laws of that State, but if the recipient is the beneficial owner of the dividends the tax so charged shall not exceed: TAcSCH a) 10 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends if the recipient is a company the capital of which is wholly or partly divided into shares and which holds directly at least 10 per cent of the capital of the company paying the dividends; b) 15 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends in all other cases. xxx xxx xxx 5. The term 'dividends' as used in this Article means income from shares, 'jouissance' shares or 'jouissance' rights, mining shares, founders' shares or other rights participating in profits, as well as income from debt-claims participating in profits and income from other corporate rights which is subjected to the same taxation treatment as income from shares by the taxation law of the State of which the company making the distribution is a resident. 6. The provisions of paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply if the recipient of the dividends, being a resident of one of the States, carries on business in the other State, of which the company paying the dividends is a resident, through a permanent establishment situated therein or performs in that other State professional services from a fixed base situated therein, and the holding in respect of which the dividends are paid is effectively connected with such permanent establishment or fixed base. In such a case, the provisions of Article 7 or Article 14, as the case may be, shall apply. xxx xxx xxx" Based on the aforequoted provisions, dividends arising in the Philippines and paid to a resident of the Netherlands may be subject to income tax in the Philippines, but the rate of tax that may be imposed thereon shall not exceed: (a) 10 percent of the gross amount of dividends if the recipient of the dividends is a company, the capital of which is wholly or partly divided into shares, and which holds directly at least 10 percent of the capital of the company paying the dividends; and (b) 15 percent of the gross amount of the dividends in all other cases. Accordingly, inasmuch as KPIC is a private company in the Netherlands, the capital of which is wholly divided into shares, and since KPIC holds directly 50 percent of the capital of San Roque (which is actually more than the required minimum shareholding of 10 percent), such dividends to be paid by San Roque to KPIC are subject to income tax in the Philippines at the rate of 10 percent of the gross amount thereof pursuant to Article 10 (2) (a) of the Philippines-Netherlands tax treaty. This ruling is issued on the basis of the facts as represented. However, if upon investigation it shall be disclosed that the actual facts are different, then this ruling shall be without force and effect insofar as the herein parties are concerned. Very truly yours, (SGD.) KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.