ITAD BIR Ruling No. 055-16

April 4, 2016 ITAD BIR RULING NO. 055-16 Article 10, Philippines-Japan tax treaty, as amended Toyota Global City, Inc. 11th Ave. and 38th St. Uptown Fort Bonifacio, Taguig City Attention: Karen M. Savellano TGC Controller Gentlemen : This refers to your tax treaty relief application filed on December 4, 2013, on behalf of Toyota Tsusho Corporation ("Toyota Japan") , requesting confirmation that dividends paid by Toyota Global City, Inc. ("Toyota Phil") to Toyota Japan are subject to the preferential rate of 10 percent pursuant to Article 10 of the amended Convention between the Republic of the Philippines and Japan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income, as amended by Protocol 1 ("Philippines-Japan tax treaty, as amended") . It is represented that Toyota Japan is a resident of Japan for tax purposes based on the Residence Certificate issued by the District Director of Nagoya Nakamura Tax Office dated August 21, 2013; that it is not registered either as a corporation or as a partnership in the Philippines per Certification of Non-Registration of Company issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission dated October 23, 2013; and that, on the other hand, Toyota Phil is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Philippines. It is further represented that during the special meeting of the Board of Directors of Toyota Phil held on November 26, 2013, the Board of Directors of Toyota Phil has declared cash dividend of one peso and ninety centavos (P1.90) per share and the same is declared from the retained earnings and/or surplus profits as of December 31, 2012 which are payable on or before December 6, 2013 to stockholders of records as of November 26, 2013; and that Toyota Japan is the registered owner of 499,999 common shares of the capital stock with par value of PhP100.00 representing 25 percent ownership in Toyota Phil as of June 8, 2010. Based on the Affidavit issued by Toyota Phil Branch on December 4, 2013, Toyota Phil Branch was not a material factor in the realization of dividends paid by Toyota Phil to Toyota Japan and such dividends were not realized in the ordinary course of trade or business of Toyota Phil Branch ; and the Toyota Phil shares held by Toyota Japan on which the dividends were paid were not used in, or held for use in, the conduct of the trade or business of Toyota Phil Branch. It is also represented, per Sworn Statement dated December 4, 2013 issued by Toyota Phil , that the issue or transaction subject of this request for ruling is not under investigation, on-going audit, administrative protest, claims for refund or issuance of a tax credit certificate, collection proceedings, or judicial appeal. In reply, please be informed that Section 28 (B) (1) of the National Internal Revenue Code (Tax Code) of 1997, as amended, applies, in general, to dividends derived in the Philippines by a nonresident foreign corporation. It provides: "Section 28. Rates of Income Tax on Foreign Corporations. xxx xxx xxx (B) Tax on Nonresident Foreign Corporation. (1) In General. Except as otherwise provided in this Code, a foreign corporation not engaged in trade or business in the Philippines shall pay a tax equal to thirty-five percent (35%) of the gross income received during each taxable year from all sources within the Philippines, such as interest, dividends, rents, royalties, salaries, premiums (except reinsurance premiums), annuities, emoluments, or other fixed or determinable annual, periodic or casual gains, profits and income, and capital gains, except capital gains subject to tax under subparagraph 5(c): Provided, That effective January 1, 2009, the rate of income tax shall be thirty percent (30%)." However, Section 32 (B) (5) of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended, provides: "Section 32. Gross Income. xxx xxx xxx (B) Exclusions from Gross Income. The following items shall not be included in gross income and shall be exempt from taxation under this Title: xxx xxx xxx (5) Income Exempt under Treaty. Income of any kind, to the extent required by any treaty obligation binding upon the Government of the Philippines. xxx xxx xxx" Thus, Article 10 of the Philippines-Japan tax treaty, as amended, which you invoke, may apply to the instant case. It provides: aDSIHc "Article 10 1. Dividends paid by a company which is a resident of a Contracting State to a resident of the other Contracting State may be taxed in that other Contracting State. 2. However, such dividends may also be taxed in the Contracting State of which the company paying the dividends is a resident, and according to the laws of that Contracting State, but if the recipient is the beneficial owner of the dividends the tax so charged shall not exceed: a) 10 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends if the beneficial owner is a company which holds directly at least 10 percent either of the voting shares of the company paying the dividends or of the total shares issued by that company during the period of six months immediately preceding the date of payment of the dividends; b) 15 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends in all other cases. xxx xxx xxx 3. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 2, the amount of tax imposed by the Philippines on the dividends paid by a company, being a resident of the Philippines, registered with the Board of Investments and engaged in preferred pioneer areas of investment under the investment incentives laws of the Philippines to a resident of Japan, who is the beneficial owner of the dividends, shall not exceed 10 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends. 4. The term 'dividends' as used in this Article means income from shares or other rights, not being debt-claims, participating in profits, as well as income from other corporate rights assimilated to income from shares by the taxation laws of the Contracting State of which the company making the distribution is a resident. 5. The provisions of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 shall not apply if the beneficial owner of the dividends, being a resident of a Contracting State, carries on business in the other Contracting State of which the company paying the dividends is a resident, through a permanent establishment situated therein, or performs in that other Contracting State independent personal services from a fixed base situated therein, and the holding in respect of which the dividends are paid is effectively connected with such permanent establishment or fixed base. In such case the provisions of Article 7 or Article 14, as the case may be, shall apply. xxx xxx xxx" Based on the aforequoted provisions, dividends arising in the Philippines and paid to a resident of Japan may be taxed in the Philippines at a rate not to exceed (a) 10 percent of the gross amount of the dividends if (i) the beneficial owner is a company which holds directly at least 10 percent of the voting shares of the company paying the dividends or of the total shares issued by that company during the period of six months immediately preceding the date of payment of the dividends, or (ii) the dividends are paid by a company, being a resident of the Philippines, which is registered with the Board of Investments and engaged in preferred pioneer areas of investment under the investment incentives laws of the Philippines; and (b) 15 percent of the gross amount of the dividends, in all other cases. However, the preferential tax rates shall not apply if the Japanese corporation has a permanent establishment in the Philippines and the subject dividend income is effectively connected to the said permanent establishment. Article five (5) of the Philippines-Japan tax treaty, as amended, defines "permanent establishment" as follows: "Article 5 1. For the purposes of this Convention, the term "permanent establishment" means a fixed place of business through which the business of an enterprise is wholly or partly carried on. 2. The term "permanent establishment" includes especially: a) a store or other sales outlet; b) a branch; c) an office; d) a factory; e) a workshop; f) a warehouse; g) a mine, an oil or gas well, a quarry or other place of extraction of natural resources. xxx xxx xxx" A perusal of the records shows that Toyota Japan has a branch here in the Philippines Toyota Phil Branch. As to whether the dividends paid by Toyota Phil to Toyota Japan is considered to have been made through a permanent establishment in the Philippines, the commentaries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development ("OECD") Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital 2 are relevant: ". . . the right to tax of the State where the permanent establishment is situated does not extend to profits that the enterprise may derive from that State but that are not attributable to the permanent establishment. This is a question on which there have historically been differences of view, a few countries having some time ago pursued a principle of general "force of attraction" according to which income such as other business profits, dividends, interest and royalties arising from sources in their territory was fully taxable by them if the beneficiary had a permanent establishment therein even though such income was clearly not attributable to that permanent establishment. Whilst some bilateral tax conventions include a limited anti-avoidance rule based on a restricted force of attraction approach that only applies to business profits derived from activities similar to those carried on by a permanent establishment, the general force of attraction approach described above has now been rejected in international tax treaty practice. The principle that is now generally accepted in double taxation conventions is based on the view that in taxing the profits that a foreign enterprise derives from a particular country, the tax authorities of that country should look at the separate sources of profit that the enterprise derives from their country and should apply to each permanent establishment test, subject to the possible application of other Articles of Convention. This solution allows simpler and more efficient tax administration and compliance, and is more closely adapted to the way in which business is commonly carried on. . . ." Relative thereto, it was held by the Supreme Court in Marubeni vs. CIR (G.R. No. 76573 dated September 14, 1989) that: "The general rule that a foreign corporation is the same juridical entity as its branch office in the Philippines cannot apply here. This rule is based on the premise that the business of the foreign corporation is conducted through its branch office, following the principal-agent relationship theory. It is understood that the branch becomes its agent here. So that when the foreign corporation transacts business in the Philippines independently of its branch, the principal-agent relationship is set aside. The transaction becomes one of the foreign corporation, not the branch or the resident foreign corporation. Corollarily, if the business transaction is conducted through the branch office, the latter becomes the taxpayer, and not the foreign corporation." ETHIDa In view thereof and considering that Toyota Phil Branch has no participation (direct or indirect) in the investments of Toyota Japan in Toyota Phil that it has no connection with the dividends to be received by Toyota Japan from Toyota Phil and that such dividends do not form part of the assets of Toyota Phil Branch such dividends are not effectively connected with Toyota Phil Branch. Moreover, since Toyota Japan, a resident of Japan with no fixed place of business in the Philippines, holds 25 percent ownership of the capital of Toyota Phil, such dividends paid by Toyota Phil to Toyota Japan are subject to the preferential tax rate of 10 percent of the gross amount thereof, pursuant to paragraph 2 (a), Article 10 of the Philippines-Japan tax treaty, as amended. This ruling is issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However, if upon investigation it shall be disclosed that the actual facts are different, then this ruling shall be without force and effect insofar as the herein parties are concerned. Very truly yours, (SGD.) KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES Commissioner of Internal Revenue Footnotes 1. Protocol amending treaty took effect on January 1, 2009. 2. OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital, Condensed Version, Eighth Edition, 2010, p. 157.