ITAD BIR Ruling No. 005-13

January 15, 2013 ITAD BIR RULING NO. 005-13 Article 12 Philippines-Japan tax treaty SMT Philippines, Inc. Special Export Processing Zone Authority 3 Mountain Drive, Light Industry and Science Park 2, Barangay La Mesa Calamba City, Laguna Attention: Mr. Yoshitaka Taki President Gentlemen : This refers to your tax treaty relief application ("TTRA") filed on January 3, 2011 requesting confirmation that royalties paid by SMT Philippines, Inc. ("SMT Philippines") (originally Andes Ionics, Inc. ; then Andes Sumitronics, Inc. ) to Nippon SMT Company Ltd. ("Nippon SMT") are subject to income tax at the rate of 10 percent pursuant to the Convention between the Republic of the Philippines and Japan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income ("Philippines-Japan tax treaty") . 1 Facts Nippon SMT is a foreign corporation and a resident of Japan based on its Articles of Association and its Certificate of Residence issued by the Akita-Minami Tax Office in Japan on October 15, 2010. Nippon SMT is located at 1-71 Arayatorikicho, Akita City, Japan. It is not registered as a corporation or partnership in the Philippines based on the Certification of Non-Registration of Company issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2010. On the other hand, SMT Philippines is a domestic corporation located at the Special Export Processing Zone Authority, 3 Mountain Drive, Light Industry and Science Park 2, Barangay La Mesa, Calamba City, Laguna, Philippines. It is registered with the Philippine Economic Zone Authority ("PEZA") as an ecozone export enterprise under Certificate of Registration No. 96-101 issued on October 2, 1996, as amended on July 26, 2010. On October 30, 2010, SMT Philippines and Nippon SMT entered into a Technology Supply Contract where Nippon SMT granted SMT Philippines the right to use related technology and process developed by and belonging to Nippon SMT in relation to the manufacture and sale of printed circuit boards and electric parts. In consideration, SMT Philippines will pay royalties to Nippon SMT equivalent to 3.5 percent of its gross sales of the products. The royalties are computed and payable every month. The Contract took effect retroactively on April 1, 2010 for a period of ten years; thereafter the Contract will be automatically renewed for subsequent periods of one year. Ruling In reply, please be informed that under Section 14 of Revenue Memorandum Order No. 72-2010 (Guidelines on the Processing of Tax Treaty Relief Applications (TTRA) Pursuant to Existing Philippine Tax Treaties) ("RMO 72-2010") , which covers income derived or which accrued on November 4, 2010 and thereafter, any availment of tax treaty relief (exemption from income tax or reduction of tax) shall be preceded by an application filed at the International Tax Affairs Division ("ITAD") of this Bureau before the payment of such income, to wit: IASCTD "SEC. 14. When and Where to File the TTRA . All tax treaty relief applications (updated BIR Forms No. 0901-D, 0901-I, 0901-R, 0901-P, 0901-S, 0901-T, 0901-O and 0901-C) relative to the implementation and interpretation of the provisions of Philippine tax treaties shall only be submitted to and received by the International Tax Affairs Division (ITAD). If the forms or any necessary documents are submitted to any other BIR Office, the application shall be considered as improperly filed. Filing should always be made BEFORE the transaction. Transaction for purposes of filing the TTRA shall mean before the occurrence of the first taxable event. Failure to properly file the TTRA with ITAD within the period prescribed herein shall have the effect of disqualifying the TTRA under this RMO. " (Emphasis ours) Also, under Section III (2) of Revenue Memorandum Order No. 1-00 (Procedures for Processing Tax Treaty Relief Application) ("RMO 1-2000") , which covers income derived or which accrued before November 4, 2010, any availment of relief shall be preceded by an application filed at ITAD at least fifteen days before the payment of such income, to wit: "III. Policies: In order to achieve the above-mentioned objectives, the following policies shall be observed: xxx xxx xxx 2. Any availment of the tax treaty relief shall be preceded by an application by filing BIR Form No. 0901 (Application for Relief from Double Taxation) with ITAD at least 15 days before the transaction i.e., payment of dividends, royalties, etc., accompanied by supporting documents justifying the relief. . ." (Emphasis ours) TIcAaH This condition is emphasized by the Court of Tax Appeals in Mirant (Philippines) Operations Corporation vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.T.A. Case No. 6382 dated June 7, 2005) where it ruled: "However, it must be remembered that a foreign corporation wishing to avail of the benefits of the tax treaty should invoke the provisions of the tax treaty and prove that indeed the provisions of the tax treaty applies to it, before the benefits may be extended to such corporation . In other words, a resident or non-resident foreign corporation shall be taxed according to the provisions of the National Internal Revenue Code, unless it is shown that the treaty provisions apply to the said corporation, and that, in cases the same are applicable, the option to avail of the tax benefits under the tax treaty has been successfully invoked. Under Revenue Memorandum Order 01-2000 of the Bureau of Internal Revenue, it is provided that the availment of a tax treaty provision must be preceded by an application for a tax treaty relief with its International Tax Affairs Division (ITAD). This is to prevent any erroneous interpretation and/or application of the treaty provisions with which the Philippines is a signatory to. The implementation of the said Revenue Memorandum Order is in harmony with the objectives of the contracting state to ensure that the granting of the benefits under the tax treaties are enjoyed by the persons or corporations duly entitled to the same. The Court notes that nowhere in the records of the case was it shown that petitioner indeed took the liberty of properly observing the provisions of the said order. Petitioner quotes various BIR, as well as ITAD, Rulings issued to several foreign corporations seeking for a tax relief from the office of the respondent. However, not any one of these rulings pertains to the petitioner. It must be stressed that BIR rulings are issued based on the facts and circumstances surrounding particular issue/issues in question and are resolved on a case-to-case basis. It would be thus erroneous to invoke the ruling of the respondent in specific cases, which have no bearing to the case of petitioner." (Emphasis ours) This decision is upheld by the Supreme Court in Resolution G.R. No. 168531 on February 18, 2008. Furthermore, the necessary requirement in RMO 1-2000 is reiterated in subsequent rulings of the Court of Tax Appeals: Deutsche Bank AG Manila Branch vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.T.A. Case No. EB 456 dated May 29, 2009), CBK Power Company Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.T.A. Case Nos. 6699, 6844 and 7166 dated March 29, 2010) and Manila North Tollways Corporation vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C.T.A. Case No. 7864 dated April 12, 2011) . IDEHCa In view of the foregoing, since the Contract that gives rise to the royalties has been in effect on April 1, 2010, but the relevant TTRA was filed only on January 3, 2011, this Office hereby DENIES relief on royalties paid by SMT Philippines to Nippon SMT on or before January 3, 2011, pursuant to Section 14 of RMO 72-2010 and Section III (2) of RMO 1-2000. Accordingly, said royalties shall be subject to income tax at the rate of 30 percent under Section 28 (B) (1) of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997 ("Tax Code") , as amended, to wit: "SEC. 28. Rates of Income Tax on Foreign Corporations . xxx xxx xxx (B) Tax on Nonresident Foreign Corporation . (1) In General. Except as otherwise provided in this Code, a foreign corporation not engaged in trade or business in the Philippines shall pay a tax equal to thirty-five percent (35%) of the gross income received during each taxable year from all sources within the Philippines, such as interests, dividends, rents, royalties, salaries, premiums (except reinsurance premiums), annuities, emoluments or other fixed or determinable annual, periodic or casual gains, profits and income, and capital gains, except capital gains subject to tax under subparagraph 5(c) and (d) above: * Provided, That effective January 1, 2009, the rate of income tax shall be thirty percent (30%)." On the other hand, royalties paid to Nippon SMT on January 4, 2011 and thereafter are subject to a reduced rate of income tax under paragraphs 1, 2 and 4, Article 12 of the Philippines-Japan tax treaty, to wit: "Article 12 1. Royalties arising in a Contracting State and paid to a resident of the other Contracting State may be taxed in that other Contracting State. 2. However, such royalties may also be taxed in the Contracting State in which they arise, and according to the laws of that Contracting State, but if the recipient is the beneficial owner of the royalties the tax so charged shall not exceed: a) 15 per cent of the gross amount of the royalties if the royalties are paid in respect of the use of or the right to use cinematograph films and films or tapes for radio or television broadcasting; CASIEa b) 10 per cent of the gross amount of the royalties in all other cases. xxx xxx xxx 4. The term 'royalties' as used in this Article means payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright of literary, artistic or scientific work including cinematograph films and films or tapes for radio or television broadcasting, any patent, trade mark, design or model, plan, secret formula or process, or for the use of, or the right to use, industrial, commercial or scientific equipment, or for information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience." Under Article 12, royalties arising in the Philippines and paid to a resident of Japan may be taxed in the Philippines at a rate not to exceed (a) 15 percent if the royalties are paid in respect of the use or the right to use of cinematograph films and films or tapes for radio or television broadcasting, and (b) 10 percent in all other cases. The term royalties means payments of any kind received as a consideration for the use of, or the right to use, any copyright of literary, artistic or scientific work including cinematograph films and films or tapes for radio or television broadcasting, any patent, trade mark, design or model, plan, secret formula or process, or for the use of, or the right to use, industrial, commercial or scientific equipment, or for information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience ("know-how") . Accordingly, since the royalties paid by SMT Philippines to Nippon SMT under the three Agreements are payments for the use of know-how and process in connection with the manufacture and sale of printed circuit boards and electric parts, and not for the use of cinematograph films and films or tapes for radio or television broadcasting, such royalties paid to Nippon SMT on January 4, 2011 and thereafter shall be subject to income tax at the rate of 10 percent, pursuant to paragraph 2 (b), Article 12 of the Philippines-Japan tax treaty. Furthermore, under Section 108 (A) of the Tax Code, the royalties paid to Nippon SMT are subject to value-added tax ("VAT"), to wit: "SEC. 108. Value-added Tax on Sale of Services and Use or Lease of Properties. (A) Rate and Base of Tax . There shall be levied, assessed and collected, a value-added tax equivalent to ten percent (10%) of gross receipts derived from the sale or exchange of services, including the use or lease of properties: Provided, that the President, upon the recommendation of the Secretary of Finance, shall, effective January 1, 2006, 2 raise the rate of value-added tax to twelve percent (12%). . ." AHDcCT However, since SMT Philippines is registered with PEZA and entitled to fiscal incentives under Republic Act No. 7916, 3 the Supreme Court, in Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Seagate Technology (Philippines) (G.R. No. 153866 dated February 11, 2005), ruled that: "Applying the special laws we have earlier discussed, respondent as an entity is exempt from internal revenue laws and regulations. This exemption covers both direct and indirect taxes, stemming from the very nature of the VAT as a tax on consumption, for which the direct liability is imposed on one person but the indirect burden is passed on to another. Respondent, as an exempt entity, can neither be directly charged for the VAT on its sales nor indirectly made to bear, as added cost to such sales, the equivalent VAT on its purchases. Ubi lex non distinguit, nec nos distinguere debemus . Where the law does not distinguish, we ought not to distinguish. Moreover, the exemption is both express and pervasive for the following reasons: First, RA 7916 states that 'no taxes, local and national, shall be imposed on business establishments operating within the ecozone.' Since this law does not exclude the VAT from the prohibition, it is deemed included. Exceptio firmat regulam in casibus non exceptis . An exception confirms the rule in cases not excepted; that is, a thing not being excepted must be regarded as coming within the purview of the general rule. Moreover, even though the VAT is not imposed on the entity but on the transaction, it may still be passed on and, therefore, indirectly imposed on the same entity a patent circumvention of the law. That no VAT shall be imposed directly upon business establishments operating within the ecozone under RA 7916 also means that no VAT may be passed on and imposed indirectly. Quando aliquid prohibetur ex directo prohibetur et per obliquum. When anything is prohibited directly, it is also prohibited indirectly." TaDSHC Accordingly, since Nippon SMT, the nonresident lessor of the intangible properties, is not a VAT registered taxpayer, such royalties paid to it by SMT Philippines shall, for purposes of VAT, be exempt from VAT and not subject to zero-percent VAT; in either case, no output VAT is shifted or passed-on to SMT Philippines . 4 This ruling is issued on the basis of the facts as represented. However, if upon investigation it shall be disclosed that the actual facts are different, then this ruling shall be without force and effect insofar as the herein parties are concerned. Very truly yours, (SGD.) KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES Commissioner of Internal Revenue Footnotes 1. As amended by the Protocol Amending the Convention between the Republic of the Philippines and Japan for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income effective January 1, 2009 . 2. The VAT rate was increased to 12 percent beginning February 1, 2006, in accordance with the Memorandum of the Executive Secretary to the Secretary of Finance dated January 31, 2006, as circularized by Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 7-2006 (Publishing the Full Text of the Memorandum from Executive Secretary Eduardo R. Ermita dated January 31, 2006 Approving the Recommendation of the Secretary of Finance to Increase the Value Added Tax Rate from Ten Percent to Twelve Percent) dated January 31, 2006. 3. Entitled An Act Providing for the Legal Framework and Mechanism for the Creation, Operation, Administration, and Coordination of Special Economic Zones in the Philippines, Creating for this Purpose, the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA), and for Other Purposes. 4. Revenue Regulations No. 16-2005 (Consolidated Value-Added Tax Regulations of 2005) , as amended, provides: "SEC. 4.106-5. Zero-Rated Sales of Goods or Properties. A zero-rated sale of goods or properties (by a VAT-registered person) is a taxable transaction for VAT purposes, but shall not result in any output tax. However, the input tax on purchases of goods, properties or services related to such zero-rated sale, shall be available as tax credit or refund in accordance with these Regulations." "SEC. 4.109-1. VAT-Exempt Transactions. (A) In general. 'VAT-exempt transactions' refer to the sale of goods or properties and/or services and the use or lease of properties that is not subject to VAT (output tax) and the seller is not allowed any tax credit of VAT (input tax) on purchases. The person making the exempt sale of goods, properties or services shall not bill any output tax to his customers because the said transaction is not subject to VAT."