Skip to main content

Interpretation of Act No. 536 Concerning the Grant of Authority to Private Companies to Act as Sureties in Government Transactions

DOJ Opinion No. 093, s. 2013 • Department of Justice Opinions • Opinions • Dec 5, 2013

Full text

DOJ OPINION NO. 093 , s. 2013 December 5, 2013 Hon. Michael G. Aguinaldo Deputy Executive Secretary for Legal Affairs Office of the President Malacaang, Manila Dear DES Aguinaldo : This refers to your follow-up query relative to the interpretation of the provisions of Act No. 536, 1 as amended, which was the subject of our opinion/comments dated July 22, 2013 in reply to your Office's queries concerning the grant of authority to private companies to act as sureties in transactions involving government and its agencies. Specifically, you want to be advised on "whether, apart from an Administrative Order from the President, an authorization from the Insurance Commissioner may . . . satisfy the requirement under Act No. 536, as amended by Act No. 2206, which (pertinently) reads: 'Section 1. ... Provided further, That no head of Department ...shall approve or accept any corporation as surety ... unless such corporation has, by contract with the Government of the Philippine Islands, been authorized to become a surety upon official recognizances, stipulations, bonds, and undertakings :...(Emphasis and underscoring supplied)' Stated differently, you inquire whether "the phrase 'Government of the Philippine Islands' in the above provision (can) be construed to include the Insurance Commission, such that the authorization may come from the Insurance Commission instead of the Office of the President?" We resolve the issue in the affirmative. TIHCcA It is settled that an administrative agency has such powers as are expressly granted to it by law and those necessarily implied in the exercise of its express powers. 2 Equally settled is the rule that while administrative bodies derive their power from the laws of their creation and that any power sought to be exercised must be found within the four corners of the statute under which the agency proceeds, it has been held that when authority is given by statute to accomplish a stated governmental purpose, there is also given, by implication, authority to do everything necessary to accomplish the purpose that is not a violation of the law or of public policy. 3 The provisions of Presidential Decree No. 612, 4 as further amended by Republic Act No. 10607, 5 pertinently provides, thus: "SEC. 2. Whenever used in this Code, the following terms shall have their respective meanings hereinafter set forth or indicated, unless the context otherwise requires: "(a) A contract of insurance is an agreement whereby one undertakes for a consideration to indemnify another against loss, damage or liability arising from an unknown or contingent event. " A contract of suretyship shall be deemed to be an insurance contract, within the meaning of this Code ,only if made by a surety who or which, as such, is doing an insurance business as hereinafter provided . "(b) The term doing an insurance business or transacting an insurance business , within the meaning of this Code, shall include: xxx xxx xxx "(2) Making or proposing to make, as surety, any contract of suretyship as a vocation and not as merely incidental to any other legitimate business or activity of the surety; xxx xxx xxx "SEC. 177. A contract of suretyship is an agreement whereby a party called the surety guarantees the performance by another party called the principal or obligor of an obligation or undertaking in favor of a third party called the obligee. It includes official recognizances, stipulations, bonds or undertakings issued by any company by virtue of and under the provisions of Act No. 536, as amended by Act No. 2206 . xxx xxx xxx "SEC. 437. ... "The Insurance Commissioner shall have the duty to see that all laws relating to insurance, insurance companies and other insurance matters, ...are faithfully executed and to perform the duties imposed upon him by this Code, . . . . DaHSIT xxx xxx xxx "In addition to the foregoing, the Commissioner shall have the following powers and functions: xxx xxx xxx "(p) Exercise such other powers as may be provided by law as well as those which may be implied from, or which are necessary or incidental to the express powers granted to the Commission to achieve the objectives and purposes of this Code . xxx xxx xxx." (Emphasis supplied) A reading of the above-quoted provisions of the Insurance Code, as further amended by R.A. No. 10607, will evidently show that the Insurance Commissioner, who is mandated to see to it that "all laws relating to insurance, insurance companies and other insurance matters," which necessarily include the laws relating to surety, can issue or grant authority to private companies intending to act as sureties in transactions involving government and its agencies. Such power is clear and categorical enough that there is no room for interpretation. There is only room for application. 6 This conclusion is strengthened by the fact that Section 1 of R.A. No. 536, as amended, is not explicit that the power to grant the authority belongs exclusively and explicitly to the President. While the President, by long-standing practice, is the one issuing said authority, the use of the term "Government of the Philippine Islands" can also be interpreted to mean the government office or officer involved in the execution and/or implementation of the law or laws on suretyship. Under the earlier-quoted provisions of R.A. No. 10607, the suretyship contracts are considered insurance contracts which are within the jurisdiction of the Insurance Commissioner. Parenthetically, assuming, argumentatively, that the power to issue the subject authority is a presidential power, there can be no legal or constitutional constraint on the delegation by the President of such authority to the Insurance Commissioner. Please be advised accordingly. Very truly yours, (SGD.) LEILA M. DE LIMA Secretary Footnotes 1. Entitled, "An Act Relative to Recognizances, Stipulations, Bonds, and Undertakings, and to Allow Certain Corporations to be Accepted as Surety Thereon". 2. See, Laguna Lake Development Authority vs. Court of Appeals , 231 SCRA 292, 306; also, Sec. of Justice Op. Nos. 106, 66 & 22, s. 2012; Nos. 46 & 22, s. 2011. 3. Sec. of Justice Op. No. 106, s. 2012; No. 59, s. 2011; No. 12, s. 2009; No. 6, s. 2008. 4. "The Insurance Code". 5. Entitled, "An Act Strengthening the Insurance Industry, Further Amending Presidential Decree No. 612, Otherwise Known as 'The Insurance Code', as Amended by Presidential Decree Nos. 1141, 1280, 1455, 1460, 1814 and 1981, and Batas Pambansa Blg. 874, and for Other Purposes". 6. See, PNB vs. Garcia ,388 SCRA 485, 491; Globe-Mackay Cable and Radio Corp. vs. NLRC , 206 SCRA 701, 711; also, Sec. of Justice Op. Nos. 105, 94 & 92, s. 2012.

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.