Skip to main content

Request for Review of BIR Ruling No. ITAD-042-13 Issued on 28 February 2013

DOF Opinion • Department of Finance • DOF Opinions • May 7, 2014

Full text

May 7, 2014 DOF OPINION 1st Indorsement Respectfully referred to Hon. Kim S. Jacinto-Henares, the Commissioner of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR), for appropriate action, the attached case docket of the Request for Review of BIR Ruling No. ITAD-042-13 (Request) filed with this Department on 23 April 2013, by Purefoods Hormel Co., Inc. (Purefoods) on behalf of Hormel Netherlands B.V. (Hormel Netherlands). The Request seeks the review of BIR Ruling No. ITAD-042-13 issued on 28 February 2013, which denied Hormel Netherland's Tax Treaty Relief Application (TTRA) dated 09 May 2012, filed with the BIR-International Tax Affairs Division (BIR-ITAD). Hormel Netherland's TTRA sought confirmation from the BIR-ITAD that a preferential tax rate of ten percent (10%) is applicable to the dividends received by Hormel Netherlands from Purefoods. As basis for the use of the preferential tax rate, the TTRA cites the Convention between the Kingdom of Netherlands and the Republic of the Philippines for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income , signed on 09 March 1989 (RP-Netherlands Tax Treaty). BIR Ruling No. ITAD-042-13 denied the application for the use of the preferential 10% tax rate on the dividends paid by Purefoods to Hormel Netherlands on or prior to 09 May 2012. As basis for the denial, the BIR-ITAD cites Revenue Memorandum Order (RMO) No. 72-2010, which requires that the filing of the TTRA "should always be made before the transaction." Under RMO No. 72-2010, for purposes of filing the TTRA, "transaction" shall mean "before the occurrence of the first taxable event." Further, the same RMO states that failure to properly file the TTRA with the BIR-ITAD within the period prescribed "shall have the effect of disqualifying the TTRA under this RMO." IHCESD BIR Ruling No. ITAD-042-13 emphasized that since RMO No. 72-2010 expressly requires that TTRAs must be filed prior to the taxable transactions, specifically the payment of the dividends to Hormel Netherlands, then the RP-Netherlands Tax Treaty relief sought may not be granted as to the dividends payments made on or prior to the filing of Hormel Netherlands's TTRA, that is, those paid on or before 09 May 2012. In connection therewith, we take note of the ruling of the Supreme Court in the case of Deutsche Bank AG Manila Branch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , G.R. No. 188550 dated 19 August 2013, which has already attained finality. Said case dealt with the validity of the requirement under RMO No. 1-2000 that any availment of a tax treaty relief must be preceded by an application with BIR-ITAD at least fifteen (15) days before the transaction. In ruling that the RMO must not be strictly construed as to deprive persons of the benefit of a tax treaty, the Supreme Court held that in conformity with the generally accepted principle in international law of pacta sunt servanda , ". . . laws and issuances must ensure that the reliefs granted under tax treaties are accorded to the parties entitled thereto. The BIR must not impose additional requirements that would negate the availment of the reliefs provided for under international agreements ." The Supreme Court further stated that, "Bearing in mind the rationale of tax treaties, the period of application for the availment of tax treaty relief as required by RMO No. 1-2000 should not operate to divest entitlement to the relief as it would constitute a violation of the duty required by good faith in complying with a tax treaty. . . . At most, the application for a tax treaty relief from the BIR should merely operate to confirm the entitlement of the taxpayer to the relief." In view of the said Decision and Resolution of the Supreme Court, we respectfully refer the Request for Review of BIR Ruling No. ITAD-042-13 filed by Purefoods on behalf of Hormel Netherlands to your Office, for appropriate action. Thank you for your attention. (SGD.) CARLO A. CARAG Undersecretary Revenue Operations and Legal Affairs Group

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.