Skip to main content

CTA Rules Governing the Presentation of Voluminous Documents as Evidence Such as Receipts, Invoices and Vouchers

CTA Circular No. 01-95 • Court of Tax Appeals • Circulars • Jan 25, 1995

Full text

January 25, 1995 CTA CIRCULAR NO. 01-95 SUBJECT : CTA Rules Governing the Presentation of Voluminous Documents as Evidence Such as Receipts, Invoices and Vouchers In accordance with the announced policy of the court and in the interest of speedy administration of justice, the Court hereby promulgates the following rules governing the presentation of voluminous documents and/or long accounts, such as receipts, invoices and vouchers, as evidence to establish certain facts, pursuant to Section 3 (c), Rule 130 of the Rules of Court and the doctrine enunciated in Compania Maritima vs. Allied Free Workers Union (77 SCRA 24), as well as Section 8 of Republic Act No. 1125. 1. The party who desires to introduce as evidence such voluminous documents must present: (a) Summary containing the total amount/s of the tax account or tax paid for the period involved and a chronological or numerical list of the numbers, dates and amounts covered by the invoices or receipts; and (b) a Certification of an independent Certified Public Accountant attesting to the correctness of the contents of the summary after making an examination and evaluation of the voluminous receipts and invoices. Such summary and certification must properly be identified by a competent witness from the accounting firm. 2. The method of individual presentation of each and every receipt or invoice or other documents for marking, identification and comparison with the originals thereof need not be done before the Court or the Commissioner anymore after the introduction of the summary and CPA certification. It is enough that the receipts, invoices and other documents covering the said accounts or payments must be pre-marked by the party concerned and submitted to the Court in order to be made accessible to the adverse party whenever he/she desires to check and verify the correctness of the summary and CPA certification. However, the originals of the said receipts, invoices or documents should be ready for verification and comparison in case doubt on the authenticity of the particular documents presented is raised during the hearing of the case. EHTCAa Be guided accordingly. Quezon City, Metro Manila, January 25, 1995. (SGD.) ERNESTO D. ACOSTA Presiding Judge (SGD.) RAMON O. DE VEYRA Associate Judge (SGD.) MANUEL K. GRUBA Associate Judge

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.