Skip to main content

Smart Communications, Inc. v. City Assessor of Dagupan

CBAA Case No. L-30 (Resolution) • Other Rules and Procedures • Central Board of Assessment Appeals • Oct 4, 2004

Full text

[CBAA CASE NO. L-30. October 4, 2004.] SMART COMMUNICATIONS, INC. , petitioner-appellant , vs. LOCAL BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS CITY OF DAGUPAN , appellee , CITY ASSESSOR OF DAGUPAN , respondent-appellee . RESOLUTION This Board rendered a decision in the above-entitled case on October 20, 2003 denying the appeal of Petitioner-Appellant, and affirming the decision of the Local Board of Assessment Appeals of the City of Dagupan. Concomitant thereto, Petitioner-Appellant filed a motion for reconsideration on November 24, 2003, alleging with similar others that it received a copy of this Board's decision on November 14, 2003. Petitioner-Appellant filed the present motion on the ground that "the Central Board of Assessment Appeals did not take into consideration Petitioner-Appellant's exemption from real property tax." After thorough evaluation thereof, this Board finds no cogent reason that would warrant a consideration of the decision sought to be reconsidered. The points raised in the said motion had already been passed upon when it promulgated the decision now being assailed. WHEREOF, the instant Motion for Reconsideration is hereby DENIED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED. Manila, Philippines, October 4, 2004. (SGD.) CESAR S. GUTIERREZ Chairman (SGD.) ANGEL P. PALOMARES Member (SGD.) RAFAEL O. CORTES Member

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.