Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
C.T.A. EB Case No. 2231 (C.T.A. Case No. 9478) (Resolution) • Court of Tax Appeals • Decisions • Jun 8, 2020
Full text
EN BANC [C.T.A. EB CASE NO. 2231. June 8, 2020.] (C.T.A. Case No. 9478) BANGKO SENTRAL NG PILIPINAS , petitioner , vs. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE , respondent . RESOLUTION On January 16, 2020, the Court issued a Resolution in the above-captioned case, denying the Motion for Reconsideration filed by petitioner. Records show that the said Resolution was received by petitioner on January 20, 2020. Petitioner then filed a Petition for Review with the Court En Banc on February 13, 2020. Counting 15 days from January 20, 2020 to file a Petition for Review with the Court En Banc , the period to appeal expired on February 4, 2020. Furthermore, said petition failed to allege the material dates indicative of the applicable prescriptive period to file the same, in gross violation of Rule 43, Sections 6 and 7 of the Revised Rules of Court. HESIcT WHEREFORE , in view of the foregoing, the Petition for Review filed by petitioner on February 13, 2020 is DISMISSED for being filed beyond the period to appeal to the Court En Banc . SO ORDERED. Roman G. del Rosario, P.J., Juanito C. Castaeda, Jr., Erlinda P. Uy, Esperanza R. Fabon-Victorino, Cielito N. Mindaro-Grulla, Ma. Belen M. Ringpis-Liban, Catherine T. Manahan, Jean Marie A. Bacorro-Villena and Maria Rowena Modesto-San Pedro, JJ. , concur.
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.