Skip to main content

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Perception Gaming, Inc.

C.T.A. EB Case No. 1431 (C.T.A. Case No. 8449) (Resolution) • Court of Tax Appeals • Decisions • Feb 21, 2018

Full text

EN BANC [C.T.A. EB CASE NO. 1431. February 21, 2018.] (C.T.A. Case No. 8449) COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE , petitioner , vs. PERCEPTION GAMING, INC. , respondent . RESOLUTION CASANOVA , J p : Submitted before the Court En Banc is petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (of the Decision dated 28 September 2017) 1 filed, through registered mail, on October 24, 2017 without respondent's comment as per Records Verification 2 dated January 11, 2018. On September 28, 2017, the Court En Banc promulgated a Decision of the present case wherein it was held that the tax exemption privilege of the Philippine Amusement Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR) extends to PAGCOR's licensees and franchisees such as herein petitioner. The dispositive portion of the said Decision is as follows: " WHEREFORE , the Petition for Review is hereby DENIED for lack of merit. Accordingly, the Decision dated August 26, 2015 and Resolution dated February 9, 2016 in CTA Case No. 8449 are both AFFIRMED . SO ORDERED. " Undaunted, petitioner filed the instant Motion for Reconsideration. However, perusal of the issues and arguments raised by petitioner in his Motion reveals that he did not raise anything new to merit any modification or reversal of the assailed En Banc Decision. In fact, the discussions therein were copied and lifted from the Petition for Review 3 filed with the Court En Banc on March 10, 2016. Accordingly, considering that no new matter was raised, and that the arguments in the instant Motion were already analyzed, weighed and passed upon in the assailed En Banc Decision, the Court En Banc finds no cogent reason to disturb the conclusions reached in the Decision dated September 28, 2017. WHEREFORE , petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration is hereby DENIED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED. (SGD.) CAESAR A. CASANOVA Associate Justice Juanito C. Castaeda, Jr., Lovell R. Bautista, Erlinda P. Uy, Esperanza R. Fabon-Victorino, Cielito N. Mindaro-Grulla, Ma. Belen M. Ringpis-Liban and Catherine T. Manahan, JJ. , concur. Roman G. del Rosario, P.J. , I reiterate my Concurring Opinion. Footnotes 1. CTA En Banc Rollo , pp. 128-132. 2. Ibid. , p. 137. 3. CTA En Banc Rollo , pp. 5-12.

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.