Phil. Gold Processing & Refining Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
C.T.A. EB Case No. 1121 (C.T.A. Case Nos. 8327 & 8328) (Resolution) • Court of Tax Appeals • Decisions • May 29, 2015
Full text
EN BANC [C.T.A. EB CASE NO. 1121. May 29, 2015.] (C.T.A. Case Nos. 8327 & 8328) PHIL. GOLD PROCESSING & REFINING CORPORATION , petitioner , vs. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE , respondent . RESOLUTION Before this Court is a "Motion for Reconsideration" filed by petitioner on May 4, 2015, praying that: 1) the Decision dated March 31, 2015 be reversed and set aside, and a new one be issued reopening the consolidated cases and admitting the Judicial Affidavit and documents appended to the Motion to Reopen filed on August 1, 2013; and 2) after due proceedings, a Decision be issued granting petitioner's claim for refund of unutilized input VAT amounting to P417,437,165.27. Respondent is hereby ordered to file her Comment on petitioner's motion within a non-extendible period of ten (10) days from receipt hereof , after which, with or without said Comment, the instant motion will be submitted for resolution. SO ORDERED. Roman G. del Rosario, P.J., Juanito C. Castaeda, Jr., Lovell R. Bautista, Caesar A. Casanova, Esperanza R. Fabon-Victorino, Cielito N. Mindaro-Grulla and Ma. Belen M. Ringpis-Liban, JJ. , concur. Erlinda P. Uy and Amelia R. Cotangco-Manalastas, JJ. , are on leave.
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.