Mindanao II Geothermal Partnership v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
C.T.A. EB Case No. 1045 (C.T.A. Case No. 8094) (Resolution) • Court of Tax Appeals • Decisions • Jun 18, 2015
Full text
EN BANC [C.T.A. EB CASE NO. 1045. June 18, 2015.] (C.T.A. Case No. 8094) MINDANAO II GEOTHERMAL PARTNERSHIP , petitioner , vs. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE , respondent . RESOLUTION Records show that on May 4, 2015, petitioner filed its Motion for Reconsideration of the Decision promulgated by the Court En Banc on March 30, 2015. Correspondingly, the respondent is hereby ordered to comment on the said Motion for Reconsideration, within ten (10) days from receipt of this Resolution. After the lapse of the given period, the instant Motion for Reconsideration will be deemed submitted for resolution, with or without the said comment. SO ORDERED . CAIHTE Roman G. del Rosario, P.J., Juanito C. Castaeda, Jr., Lovell R. Bautista, Erlinda P. Uy, Caesar A. Casanova, Esperanza R. Fabon-Victorino, Cielito N. Mindaro-Grulla, Amelia R. Cotangco-Manalastas and Ma. Belen M. Ringpis-Liban, JJ., concur.
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.