Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Ajinomoto Phils. Corp.
C.T.A. EB Case No. 1010 (C.T.A. Case No. 7877) (Resolution) • Court of Tax Appeals • Decisions • Jan 29, 2015
Full text
EN BANC [C.T.A. EB CASE NO. 1010. January 29, 2015.] (C.T.A. Case No. 7877) COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE , petitioner , vs . AJINOMOTO PHILIPPINES CORPORATION , respondent . [C.T.A. EB CASE NO. 1015. January 29, 2015.] (C.T.A. Case No. 7877) AJINOMOTO PHILIPPINES CORPORATION , petitioner , vs . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE , respondent . RESOLUTION Commissioner of Internal Revenue's (CIR) Motion for Partial Reconsideration and Ajinomoto Philippines Corporation's (Ajinomoto) Motion for Partial Reconsideration (of the Decision promulgated on November 3, 2014 of this Court en banc ) are hereby NOTED. CIR is DIRECTED to file her Comment on Ajinomoto's Motion for Partial Reconsideration, likewise Ajinomoto is DIRECTED to file its Comment on CIR's Motion for Partial Reconsideration, within ten (10) days from receipt hereof. Upon submission of the parties' respective Comment or the expiration of the period given to file the same, the motions for partial reconsideration shall be deemed submitted for resolution. SO ORDERED . cDCaTS Roman G. del Rosario, P.J., Juanito C. Castaeda, Jr., Lovell R. Bautista, Erlinda P. Uy, Caesar A. Casanova, Esperanza R. Fabon-Victorino, Cielito N. Mindaro-Grulla, Amelia R. Cotangco-Manalastas and Ma. Belen M. Ringpis-Liban, JJ., concur.
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.