Skip to main content

People v. GH Resources and Training Services, Inc.

C.T.A. Crim. Case No. O-818 (Resolution) • Court of Tax Appeals • Decisions • Dec 9, 2020

Full text

SECOND DIVISION [C.T.A. CRIM. CASE NO. O-818. December 9, 2020.] For: Violation of Sections 255, in relation to Sections 253 and 256, of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) of 1997, as amended PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES , plaintiff , vs. GH RESOURCES AND TRAINING SERVICES, INC., 4757-B Barasoain St., Brgy. Olympia, Makati City, GRACE H. CARTAGO, (President) 4757-B Barasoain St., Brgy. Olympia, Makati City (At-Large) , accused . RESOLUTION For resolution of the Court is the plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration , filed by registered mail on November 3, 2020 and received by the Court on November 15, 2020. The instant motion assails the Court's Resolution dated June 1, 2020, dismissing the case on the ground of prescription. In its motion, plaintiff's counsel alleges that he only received the Court's Resolution dated June 1, 2020 on October 16, 2020 and that the handling prosecutor was already transferred to Makati. However, counsel did not offer proof of such late receipt. Contrary to plaintiff's allegation, records reveal that the instant motion was filed 151 days after the Department of Justice received the assailed Resolution on June 5, 2020 , and 148 days after the Bureau of Internal Revenue received the assailed Resolution on June 8, 2020 . In fact, the Court had previously issued a Resolution dated October 7, 2020, noting that the records show that no appeal has been taken by the Public and Special Prosecutors in the above-captioned case within the prescribed period, thus rendering the Resolution dated June 1, 2020 final and executory. Therefore, it became the ministerial duty of the Court to issue the Entry of Judgment in this case. Hence, the instant motion was filed beyond the reglementary period and the Court can no longer act on the same. WHEREFORE , premises considered, plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED. Juanito C. Castaeda, Jr. and Jean Marie A. Bacorro-Villena, JJ. , concur.

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.