Skip to main content

Lufthansa German Airlines-Philippine Branch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

C.T.A. Case No. 8601 (Resolution) • Court of Tax Appeals • Decisions • Jun 27, 2016

Full text

SECOND DIVISION [C.T.A. CASE NO. 8601. June 27, 2016.] LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES-PHILIPPINE BRANCH , petitioner , vs. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE , respondent . RESOLUTION COTANGCO-MANALASTAS , J p : For resolution is respondent's Motion for Reconsideration Re: Decision dated March 21, 2016 , filed on April 6, 2016. 1 Petitioner filed its Comment (on Respondent's Motion for Reconsideration dated April 6, 2016) on May 5, 2016. 2 The motion assails this Court's March 21, 2016 Decision in which the Court cancelled the assessment against petitioner, to wit : "WHEREFORE, premises considered, the deficiency income tax assessment issued by respondent against petitioner covering taxable year 2008 is hereby CANCELLED." 3 In the motion, respondent argues once again that petitioner is liable at the rate of 35% from income within the Philippines; that disallowance of the tax credit carried over is proper; that the writedowns on receivables and losses on current available for sale financial assets were properly disallowed; and, that the compromise penalty was imposed due to petitioner's failure to register its books of accounts. On the other hand, petitioner argues that the 35% rate as already been used by both respondent and the Court in computing the tax liability for taxable year 2008; that there is no double crediting of the tax overpayment of P3,836,895.31; that the disallowance of the writedowns on receivables and losses on current available for sale financial assets have been upheld by the Court; and, that petitioner has paid P150,000 in full settlement of the compromise penalty. The Court finds that the issues raised by respondent have been discussed and passed upon extensively in the Decision. Respondent raises no compelling argument for this Court to modify or reverse its Decision. WHEREFORE , the instant Motion for Reconsideration Re: Decision dated March 21, 2016 , is hereby DENIED for lack of merit. SO ORDERED . (SGD.) AMELIA R. COTANGCO-MANALASTAS Associate Justice Juanito C. Castaeda, Jr., J., concurs. Caesar A. Casanova, J., is on official business. Footnotes 1. Docket, pp. 2149-2156. 2. Docket, pp. 2166-2170. 3. Docket, p. 2148.

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.