Isuzu Philippines Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
C.T.A. Case No. 6079 (Resolution) • Court of Tax Appeals • Decisions • Aug 7, 2007
Full text
SECOND DIVISION [C.T.A. CASE NO. 6079. August 7, 2007.] ISUZU PHILIPPINES CORPORATION , petitioner , vs . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE , respondent . R E S O L U T I O N This resolves petitioner's "Motion for Issuance of Writ of Execution" filed on July 16, 2007. Records show that the Decision of the Second Division in the above-captioned case dated June 17, 2005 was appealed by herein respondent to the CTA En Banc, docketed as CTA EB No. 168. On July 27, 2006, the CTA En Banc denied herein respondent's Petition for Review, for lack of merit. Aggrieved by the Decision of the CTA En Banc, herein respondent elevated the case to the Supreme Court docketed as G.R. No. 173919. On November 15, 2006, the Supreme Court denied herein respondent's Petition for Review. On December 28, 2006, Entry of Judgment was correspondingly issued. aAcDSC It appearing that the decision of the Supreme Court has already become final and executory, the petitioner is entitled as a matter of right to a writ of execution. It, therefore, becomes the ministerial duty of this Court to issue a writ of execution. WHEREFORE, petitioner's Motion for Issuance of Writ of Execution is hereby GRANTED. Let the corresponding Writ of Execution be issued. SO ORDERED. Juanito C. Castaeda, Jr., Erlinda P. Uy and Olga Palanca-Enriquez, JJ., concur.
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.