Bureau of Local Government Finance Opinion
Bureau of Local Government Finance Opinion • Bureau of Local Government Finance • Opinions • Jan 30, 2012
Full text
January 30, 2012 BUREAU OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE OPINION 1st Indorsement Respectfully returned to the OIC-City Treasurer, Cabanatuan City her herein letter dated May 31, 2011, requesting for opinion to further enlighten her regarding the correct interpretation of the provisions of Section 276, R.A. No. 7160, otherwise known as the Local Government Code of 1991, in relation to Resolution No. 202-2007, and Ordinance No. 2007-036, both of the Sangguniang Panlungsod of Cabanatuan City. Ordinance No. 2007-036, conditionally condoned all the interests and penalties on the delinquent real property taxes due from CHAS Realty Development Corporation (CRDC for brevity) and likewise granted compromise agreement by extending the period of payment of the real property taxes in arrears, i.e., CYs 2000-2007 and current, i.e., CYs 2008-2018. The OIC-City Treasurer deferred the implementation of subject Ordinance No. 2007-036, citing certain alleged deficiencies on the validity thereof. It is also her contention that the condonation of interests and penalties on the real property taxes due from CRDC runs counter to the intensified revenue generation program of Cabanatuan City. In this connection, the attention of the OIC-City Treasurer is hereby invited to this Bureau's earlier clarification concerning Section 276 of the Local Government Code of 1991, which was embodied in the hereto attached letter dated January 5, 2009, to the City Mayor of Naga City, Cebu, as follows: "The Local Government Code of 1991, authorized the condonation or reduction of real property taxes and interests . . . through the local sanggunian . . ., viz. : ADSTCa 'SEC. 276. Condonation or Reduction of Real Property Tax and Interest. In case of a general failure of crops or substantial decrease in the price of agricultural or agribased products, or calamity in any province, city, or municipality, the sanggunian concerned, by ordinance passed prior to the first (1st) day of January of any year and upon recommendation of the Local Disaster Coordinating Council, may condone or reduce, wholly or partially, the taxes and interest thereon for the succeeding year or years in the city or municipality affected by the calamity. "Section 276 allows the condonation or reduction of real property tax and interest, wholly or partially, in the event of: 1) general failure of crops; 2) substantial decrease in the price of agricultural or agri-based products; or 3) calamity, for the succeeding year or years after the occurrence of any of the events mentioned, through an ordinance passed before the 1st day of January of any year, on recommendation of the Local Disaster Coordinating Council. It must be noted that the presence of an economic crisis is not one of the conditions by which condonation or reduction of real property tax or interest may be granted by the sanggunian. "The condonation or reduction contemplated under Section 276, is prospective in application, meaning, only real property taxes or interests due the succeeding year or years, after any of the abovementioned incidents happened which adversely affected the taxpayer's ability to pay, may be condoned or reduced, and not unpaid real property taxes or interests of the past year or years. Further, as such applicability or nature of the condonation or reduction is prospective, what are covered therefore are real property taxes and interest, not penalties or surcharges." "Incentive or relief as reason for condonation or reduction of real property tax and interest may not be appropriate for the reason that tax incentives or reliefs as authorized under Section 192 (Authority to Grant Tax Exemption Privileges) of the Local Government Code of 1991, are deemed applicable for local taxes such as business taxes covered in Title One, Book II of the same Code." "Section 276 of the same Code, may be the basis for such condonation or reduction of taxes and interests provided the requirements or conditions set forth therein are satisfied to ensure that such condonation or reduction would be an effective means of generating additional revenues without undermining confidence in tax collection and enforcement, and not to discourage diligent taxpayers." Meanwhile, for the proper guidance of the OIC-City Treasurer of Cabanatuan in connection with the compromise agreement between Cabanatuan City and CRDC as embodied under Section 2 of subject Ordinance No. 2007-036, providing for an installment payment scheme for real property taxes in arrears and current from 2008 until 2018, the following requisites and measures may be considered: aITDAE 1. A duly enacted ordinance, granting authority upon the provincial or city treasurer or municipal treasurer of Metropolitan Manila to enter into a compromise agreement and prescribing the terms and conditions thereof; 2. The aggregate delinquent real property tax is so much and too burdensome to the property owner-taxpayer and there exists serious doubt that the owner-taxpayer could ever pay the full amount of tax liability at one time within the remainder of the statutory period for collection; 3. The term of payment must not be beyond the remainder of the statutory period for collection, or beyond the period of redemption, as the case may be; 4. The compromise agreement does not defeat the tax collection efforts of the local taxing authority or does not serve to discourage diligent taxpayers; 5. The amount of tax liability is not reduced; and 6. The compromise agreement is most advantageous to the local taxing authority vis--vis the tax collection costs and the circumstances, and must be in conformity with the provisions of the Local Government Code on real property taxes. It is hoped that with the foregoing clarifications, the OIC-City Treasurer will gain clearer understanding regarding condonation of real property tax and resorting to compromise agreement for the collection of delinquent real property tax. At this juncture, it must be noted that subject ordinance has been enacted by the Sangguniang Panlungsod and in the absence of a subsequent declaration of its invalidity or an order effecting suspension of its implementation, the same remains valid and enforceable. Be guided accordingly. ISAcHD (SGD.) SALVADOR M. DEL CASTILLO OIC-Executive Director
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.