BIR Ruling [UN-355-95]
BIR Ruling [UN-355-95] • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Issuances • Rulings (Unnumbered) • Oct 2, 1995
Full text
October 2, 1995 BIR RULING [UN-355-95] Alcorn (Production) Philippines, Inc. 19th Floor, Pacific Star Bldg. corner Gil Puyat Avenue & Makati Avenue Makati City Attention: Mr . Jimmy M . Manrique VP-Finance & Comptroller Gentlemen : This refers to your letter dated May 31, 1995 requesting for a confirmation of your opinion that payments to be made to Pacific Richfield Marine (Pte) Ltd. (Pacific) under a drilling contract whose guaranteed commencement date is April 7, 1995, are exempt from Philippine income/withholding tax pursuant to Article 5 (2) (1) of the RP-Singapore Tax Treaty and consequently from the 35% withholding tax provided for in Section 50 (a) in relation to Section 25 (b) (1) of the Tax Code, as amended. cdtech It is represented that Alcorn (Production) Philippines, Inc., (ALCORN) is a domestic corporation engaged in petroleum operations; that it entered into a drilling contract with Pacific, a non-resident foreign corporation based in Singapore, Under which the latter will provide a vessel capable of performing the oilfield support services for the oil wells drilling operations in offshore Palawan starting April 7, 1995; and that the primary term of the contract, which is the time required to re-enter, sidetrack and complete the well drilling, is not more than seventy (70) days; that Pacific does not have a fixed place of business in the Philippines and will render service for an actual period of less than 183 days. In reply, please be informed that pursuant to the Article 8 (Business Profits) in relation to Article 5 of the RP-Singapore Tax Treaty, payment to be made to Pacific by Alcorn, in connection with their drilling contract are not subject to Philippine income tax and consequently to the 35% withholding tax because there is no permanent establishment where their profit could be attributed in the Philippines (BIR Ruling No. 125-91 dated June 26, 1991) This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However, if upon investigation, it will be disclosed that the facts are different, the this ruling shall be considered null and void. Very truly yours, ALICIA P. CLEMENO Assistant Commissioner (Legal Service) By: ALICIA P. TOMACRUZ Head Rev. Executive Assistant (Legal Service)
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.