Skip to main content

Coca-Cola Femsa Philippines, Inc.

BIR Ruling No. OT-207-2022 • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Issuances • Rulings (Numbered) • May 5, 2022

Full text

May 5, 2022 BIR RULING NO. OT-207-2022 Sections 24 (C) and 175 of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended; RR No. 13-2004; BIR Ruling No. OT-0653-2020 Coca-Cola Femsa Philippines, Inc. 27F Net Lima Building, 5th Ave. cor. 26th St. Bonifacio Global City, Taguig City 1634 Attention: Mary Ann Torres Tax Executive Gentlemen : This refers to your request on behalf of Coca-Cola Femsa Philippines, Inc. 1 ("CCFPI"), for confirmation on the exemption from payment of taxes on its transfer of Manila Polo Club ("MPC") membership from one officer to another. Background: It is represented that CCFPI, with Taxpayer's Identification Number (TIN) 000-000-000-000, is a domestic corporation engaged in the manufacture, distribution and sale of non-alcoholic beverages, including juices and water. CCFPI owns shares in MPC and are recorded as assets in its books. Due to MPC's policy and in order to avail of the privileges of the club, one (1) propriety share was issued to its former officer, Mr. Juan Carlos G. Dominguez, as evidenced by the Deed of Trust and Assignment of Stock dated August 5, 2013 and Proprietary Membership Certificate No. 6760. On December 4, 2017, Mr. Juan Pablo Rodriguez, the Commercial Director-Vismin for CCFPI, executed a Declaration of Trust regarding Proprietary Membership Certificate No. 6760 formerly assigned to Mr. Juan Carlos G. Dominguez. As a result, the said share shall now be transferred to Mr. Juan Pablo Rodriguez as the new officer of CCFPI. Hence, you now request confirmation on the following: 1. The transfer of the proprietary membership certificate representing one (1) share of MPC beneficially owned by CCFPI is not subject to capital gains tax (CGT) because it does not involve any monetary consideration and is merely a transfer of legal title to the proprietary share from one nominee of the corporation to another nominee; 2. There being no donative intent under the above-described circumstances, the transfer is not subject to donor's tax; and 3. The transfer is not subject to the documentary stamp tax (DST) imposed under Section 176 of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as amended, but only to the DST imposed under Section 188 of the same Code. In reply, please be informed as follows: Capital gains tax (CGT) A declaration of trust has been defined as an act by which a person acknowledges that the property, title to which he holds, is held by him for the use of another. 2 A trust is a legal relationship between one person having an equitable ownership of property and another person owning the legal title to such property, the equitable ownership of the former entitling him to the performance of certain duties and the exercise of certain powers by the latter. What distinguishes a trust from other relations is the separation of the legal title and equitable ownership of the property. In a trust relation, legal title is vested in the fiduciary while equitable ownership is vested in a cestui que trust . 3 A trust arises in favor of one who pays the purchase money of property in the name of another, because of the presumption that he who pays for a thing intends a beneficial interest therein for himself. 4 The principle of a resulting trust is based on the equitable doctrine that valuable consideration, and not legal title, determines the equitable title or interest and are presumed always to have been contemplated by the parties. They arise from the nature or circumstances of the consideration involved in a transaction whereby one person thereby becomes invested with legal title but is obligated in equity to hold his legal title for the benefit of another. 5 In the case of Sime Darby Pilipinas, Inc. v. Mendoza , 6 Sime Darby acquired a Class "A" club share in Alabang Country Club ("ACC") in 1987, but being a corporation which was expressly disallowed by ACC's By-Laws to acquire and register the club share under its name, registered the share under the name of respondent Mendoza, Sime Darby's sales manager at the time. The Supreme Court held that a trust arrangement existed between Sime Darby and Mendoza and while the share was bought by Sime Darby and placed under the name of Mendoza, the latter's title was only limited to the use and enjoyment of the club's facilities and privileges while employed with the company. In this case, the MPC share covered by Proprietary Membership Certificate No. 6760 was placed by CCFPI under the name of Mr. Juan Carlos G. Dominguez as trustee, and the latter's title was only limited to the use and enjoyment of the club's facilities and privileges while employed with the company. Likewise, the Declaration of Trust dated December 4, 2017 executed by Mr. Juan Pablo Rodriguez, provides that the latter does not have any title, right, claim or interest whatsoever in the MPC share and that he is holding only the legal ownership of the same with the beneficial ownership pertaining to CCFPI. Thus, the transfer of the legal title of the MPC share from the name of Mr. Juan Carlos G. Dominguez as former trustee to Mr. Juan Pablo Rodriguez as the new trustee, is not subject to CGT considering that the transfer involves neither monetary consideration nor change in beneficial ownership. Since Mr. Juan Carlos G. Dominguez only possessed legal title over the MPC share, the transfer between her and Mr. Juan Pablo Rodriguez will be limited only to the transfer of the legal title. The intention of CCFPI in giving legal title of the MPC share to Mr. Juan Pablo Rodriguez is to make him an extension of CCFPI's ownership over the same. Practically speaking, being a juridical entity, CCFPI cannot directly enjoy the privileges that come with owning the MPC share, hence, must assign someone to use the club facilities on its behalf. Therefore, since the beneficial ownership over the MPC share remains with CCFPI, there is no actual transfer of ownership of the MPC share as between CCFPI and its trustee and/or from such trustee to the next trustee, the same is not subject to CGT. Donor's tax Well-settled in our jurisprudence is the fact that the essential elements of a valid donation are: 1. the reduction of the patrimony of the donor; 2. the increase in the patrimony of the donee; and 3. the intent to do an act of liberality (animus donandi) . Clearly, there is no intention on the part of any of the parties to the Declaration of Trust dated December 4, 2017 to donate the said MPC share since the transaction is purely for a legitimate business purpose. Thus, the transaction will not be subject to donor's tax since there is no intention to donate, and the transaction is a bona fide transaction effected solely for business reasons. Documentary stamp tax (DST) The transfer is likewise not subject to the DST imposed under Section 175 of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as amended. While assignment of shares of stock of a domestic corporation is subject to DST upon execution of the deed transferring ownership or rights thereto, or upon delivery, assignment or indorsement of such shares in favor of another, Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 13-2004 7 dated December 23, 2004, implementing the provisions of Republic Act (RA) No. 9243, otherwise known as "An Act Rationalizing Further the Structure and Administration of the Documentary Stamp Tax" qualifies this rule by stating that for a sale or exchange to be taxable, there must be an actual or constructive transfer of beneficial ownership of the shares of stock from one person to another . Section 4 of RR No. 13-2004 provides that: "For a sale or exchange to be taxable, there must be an actual or constructive transfer of beneficial ownership of the shares of stock from one person to another. Such transfer may be manifested by the clear exercise of attributes of ownership over such stocks by the transferee, or by an actual entry of a change in the name appearing in the certificate of stock or in the Stock and Transfer Book of the issuing corporation or by any entry indicating transfer of beneficial ownership in any form of registry including those of a duly authorized scripless registry, such as those maintained for or by the Philippine Stock Exchange. However, if by the transfer of certificates of stock from a resigned trustee to a newly appointed trustee such certificate of stock remains in the name of the cestui que trust or the resigned trustee so that the new trustee is constituted as mere depository of the stock, such transfer is not taxable. Provided, however, that transfer of shares to "nominees" to qualify them to sit in the board or to qualify them to perform any act in relation to the corporation shall not be subject to the DST provided herein only upon proof of a duly executed Nominee Agreement showing the purpose of the transfer; that the transfer is without consideration other than the undertaking of the nominee to only represent the beneficial owner of the stock; and the transfer is in trust." (Emphasis and underscoring supplied) In this case, there is no actual or constructive transfer of the beneficial ownership of the MPC share. Only the legal title was transferred when CCFPI changed its assignee from Mr. Juan Carlos G. Dominguez to Mr. Juan Pablo Rodriguez. Also, the execution of and by the express provisions of the Declaration of Trust dated December 4, 2017, the intention of the parties was clearly for Mr. Juan Pablo Rodriguez to hold the MPC share in trust for CCFPI. Moreover, in the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. First Express Pawnshop, Inc. , 8 the Supreme Court explained that Sections 175 and 176 of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as amended, on DST contemplates the execution of a subscription agreement in order for a taxpayer to be liable to pay the DST. The Supreme Court ruled, thus: "As pointed out by the CTA, Sections 175 and 176 of the Tax Code contemplate a subscription agreement in order for a taxpayer to be liable to pay the DST. A subscription contract is defined as any contract for the acquisition of unissued stocks in an existing corporation or a corporation still to be formed. A stock subscription is a contract by which the subscriber agrees to take a certain number of shares of the capital stock of a corporation, paying for the same or expressly or impliedly promising to pay for the same." Therefore, a mere transfer of a share from one trustee to another, without change in the beneficial ownership of the share is not the taxable transaction being contemplated under the provisions of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as amended, on DST. In view thereof, the herein transfer is not subject to DST as there is no transfer or conveyance to Mr. Juan Pablo Rodriguez of the beneficial ownership of or any right, claim or interest over the MPC share or over the assets of CCFPI. There being no new conveyance to speak of in this case, there is no new exercise of a privilege upon which DST may be imposed. However, the notarial acknowledgement to the Declaration of Trust dated December 4, 2017 is subject to the DST of P30.00 under Section 188 of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as amended. This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However, if upon investigation, it will be disclosed that the facts are different, then this ruling shall be considered null and void. Very truly yours, CAESAR R. DULAY Commissioner of Internal Revenue By: (SGD.) MARISSA O. CABREROS Deputy Commissioner Legal Group Officer-in-Charge Footnotes 1. Formerly: Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines, Inc. 2. Resurreccion De Leon, et al. v. Emiliano Molo-Peckson, et al. , G.R. No. L-17809, December 29, 1962. 3. Soledad Caezo substituted by William Caezo and Victoriano Caezo v. Concepcion Rojas , G.R. No. 148788, November 23, 2007. 4. Marsh Thomson v. Court of Appeals and the American Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines, Inc. , G.R. No. 116631, October 28, 1998. 5. Spouses Trinidad v. Imson , G.R. No. 197728, September 16, 2015. 6. G.R. No. 202247, June 19, 2013. 7. Implementing the Provisions of Republic Act No. 9243, An Act Rationalizing the Provisions on the Documentary Stamp Tax of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as Amended, and for Other Purposes. 8. G.R. Nos. 172045-46, June 16, 2009.

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.