NAPICO Homeowners Association, Inc. IX-A
BIR Ruling No. CMP-134-2022 • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Issuances • Rulings (Numbered) • Apr 18, 2022
Full text
April 18, 2022 BIR RULING NO. CMP-134-2022 Republic Act (RA) No. 7279; BIR Ruling No. 630-18 NAPICO Homeowners Association, Inc. IX-A 983 Kamagong Street, NAPICO, Brgy. Manggahan, Pasig City 1607 Attention: MAA _______________ Gentlemen : This refers to your letter dated October 29, 2021, requesting exemption from the payment of taxes relative to the transfer of titles of land from NAPICO Homeowners' Association, Inc. IX-B in favor of its qualified member-beneficiaries pursuant to Republic Act (RA) No. 7279, otherwise known as the "Urban Development and Housing Act of 1992." HTcADC It is represented that NAPICO Homeowners' Association, Inc. IX-A with Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) ____________ is registered with the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB) under Registration Number __________ that the Association acquired five (5) parcels of land owned by the Metro Manila Development Authority (MMDA) under the Community Mortgage Program (CMP); that the MMDA-NAPICO CMP is a joint project of the MMDA, the National Home Mortgage Finance Corporation (NHMFC) and the National Housing Authority (NHA) for the benefit of NAPICO Homeowners Association as certified by the MMDA in its letter dated September 11, 2002; that the Association has secured a land acquisition loan under the Social Housing Finance Corporation (SHFC) Community Mortgage Program as certified by the SHFC in its letter dated August 13, 2019; and that the Association is now in the process of effecting the transfer/individualization of the said property to its Three Hundred Forty Eight (348) member-beneficiaries who actually bought the said parcel of land. In reply, please be informed that the transfer of the subdivided lots in favor of the qualified socialized housing member-beneficiaries of NAPICO Homeowners' Association, Inc. IX-B is not subject to either the capital gains tax (CGT) imposed under Section 27 (D) (5) of the National Internal Revenue Code (Tax Code) of 1997, as amended, or the creditable withholding tax (CWT) imposed under Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 2-98, as amended, considering that said transfer is only a formality to finally effect the transfer of the subject property to its member-beneficiaries who actually bought the same from the former owner through the Association. In other words, the Association is merely transferring the ownership of the property to its member-beneficiaries who actually own the same. (BIR Ruling No. 630-18 dated April 11, 2018) Moreover, the said transfer is not subject to the donor's tax imposed under Section 99 of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended, since there is no donative intent on the part of Association to donate the property to its members-beneficiaries, considering that it could not donate property the ownership of which already belongs to the members-beneficiaries themselves. Furthermore, under Section 196 of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended, the deeds or documents subject to the documentary stamp tax (DST) imposed therein are those where the realty sold are granted, assigned, transferred, donated or otherwise conveyed to a purchaser or purchasers or to any other person or persons designated by such purchaser or purchasers, thereby excluding from its purview the instant case. Accordingly, the transfer of the subdivided lots in favor of the beneficiaries is not subject to DST under Section 196 of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended. However, the notarial acknowledgment to the deed of conveyance is subject to the DST of P30.00 pursuant to Section 188 of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended. It is, however, understood that this Ruling is never intended, and shall not be construed, as giving authority to the concerned Register of Deeds (RD) to effect transfer of the land titles in the names of the qualified socialized housing member-beneficiaries without the necessary Certificate Authorizing Registration (CAR) issued by this Bureau. In this regard, this Ruling shall be presented to the Revenue District Office (RDO) concerned in order for the latter to issue the CAR after the submission of the complete requirements provided under Revenue Memorandum Order (RMO) No. 15-2003. This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However, if upon investigation, it will be disclosed that the facts are different, then this ruling shall be considered null and void. Issued this 18th day of April, 2022. CAESAR R. DULAY Commissioner of Internal Revenue By: (SGD.) MARISSA O. CABREROS Deputy Commissioner Legal Group Officer-in-Charge
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.