Skip to main content

Mygold and Jewels Shop, Inc.

BIR Ruling No. 530-18 • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Issuances • Rulings (Numbered) • Mar 16, 2018

Full text

March 16, 2018 BIR RULING NO. 530-18 Section 32 (B) (6) (b), 1997 NIRC; BIR Ruling No. 192-2016; BIR Ruling No. 479-2014; BIR Ruling No. 416-2012 Mygold and Jewels Shop, Inc. M/F, Cebu Long Se Temple Bldg. Osmea Blvd. cor. Jasmin St. Capitol Site, Cebu City Attention: AAA _______________ Gentlemen : This refers to your letter dated September 7, 2015 requesting for confirmation that the separation benefits to be given by MyGold and Jewels Shop, Inc. (MyGold for brevity) to its employees due to closure and cessation of its business operations are exempt from income tax and consequently to withholding tax pursuant to Section 32 (B) (6) (b) of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended. It is represented that MyGold (TIN 000-000-000-000) is a domestic corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of the Philippines. It is duly registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under Company Reg. No. CS201025141 to engage in buying, selling, trading, distributing, importing, exporting and otherwise dealing in any all kinds of jewelries, jewels and other jewelry products, and in general, to carry on the business of a retailer and wholesaler of goods and merchandise. On August 12, 2015, at least a majority of the Board of Directors and Stockholders owning at least 2/3 of the outstanding capital stock of MyGold approved the closure and cessation of operations of all its business establishments effective on September 15, 2015. In view thereof, MyGold shall terminate all of its existing employees effective September 15, 2015, and pay them a separation pay equivalent to one (1) month pay for every year of service. On August 14, 2015, MyGold served on all its existing employees, Notices of Termination of their services due to closure and cessation of operations, which shall be effective on September 15, 2015. On the same date, MyGold also filed an Establishment Employment (Termination) Report with the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE-Region 7),Cebu City. The separated employees are hereto enumerated as follows: CAIHTE Name of Worker Address 1. AAA __________________ 2. BBB __________________ 3. CCC __________________ 4. DDD __________________ 5. EEE __________________ 6. FFF __________________ 7. GGG __________________ 8. HHH __________________ 9. III __________________ 10. JJJ __________________ 11. KKK __________________ 12. LLL __________________ 13. MMM __________________ 14. NNN __________________ 15. OOO __________________ 16. PPP __________________ 17. QQQ __________________ 18. RRR __________________ 19. SSS __________________ 20. TTT __________________ 21. UUU __________________ 22. VVV __________________ 23. WWW __________________ 24. XXX __________________ 25. YYY __________________ 26. ZZZ __________________ 27. AAAA __________________ 28. BBBB __________________ 29. CCCC __________________ 30. DDDD. __________________ 31. EEEE __________________ 32. FFFF __________________ 33. GGGG __________________ 34. HHHH __________________ 35. IIII __________________ 36. JJJJ __________________ 37. KKKK __________________ 38. LLLL __________________ 39. MMMM __________________ 40. NNNN __________________ 41. OOOO __________________ 42. PPPP __________________ 43. QQQQ __________________ 44. RRRR __________________ 45. SSSS __________________ 46. TTTT __________________ 47. UUUU __________________ 48. VVVV __________________ 49. WWWW __________________ 50. XXXX __________________ 51. YYYY __________________ 52. ZZZZ __________________ 53. AAAAA __________________ 54. BBBBB __________________ In reply, please be informed that pursuant to Section 32 (B) (6) (b) of the Tax Code of 1997, as intended, any amount received by an official or employee or by his heirs from the employer as a consequence of separation of such official or employee from the service of the employer due to death, sickness or other physical disability or for any cause beyond the control of the said official or employee shall not be included in the gross income and shall be exempt from taxation under Title II of the same Tax Code. (BIR Ruling No. 416-2012 dated June 25, 2012) The above-mentioned law requires the presence of two (2) conditions in order that the employee benefits may be granted tax exemption, namely: (1) the employee is separated from the service of the employer due to death, sickness or other physical disability or for any cause beyond the control of the said official or employee, and (2) the employer pays benefits to the official or employee or his heirs as a consequence of such separation. Accordingly, the separation pay to be received by the above-listed employees of Mygold as a result of its closure and cessation of its business operation is exempt from income tax and consequently from the withholding tax prescribed by Section 79 of the 1997 Tax Code, as implemented by Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 2-98, as amended by RR Nos. 6-2001 and 12-2001. Moreover, pursuant to Section 2.78.1 (A) (7) of RR 2-98, as amended, the terminal pay, i.e. ,commutation and payment of monetized unused vacation leave credits not exceeding ten (10) days during the year are not subject to income tax and consequently to the withholding tax. Conversely, the cash equivalent of vacation leave exceeding ten (10) days is subject to tax. However, this same principle cannot apply to sick leave credits since an employee must actually go on sick leave to be able to avail of said leave credits. It is, however, understood that this exemption does not include the payment of the separated employees' salaries and the payment of the 13th month pay and other benefits in excess of the Php82,000.00 1 threshold under Section 2.78.1 (A) (3) (a) and (A) (7) of RR 2-98, as amended. (BIR Ruling No. 192-2016 dated May 16, 2016 and BIR Ruling No. 479-2014 dated December 3, 2014) HEITAD This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However, if upon investigation, it will be ascertained that the facts are different, then this ruling shall be considered as null and void. aDSIHc Very truly yours, (SGD.) CAESAR R. DULAY Commissioner of Internal Revenue Footnotes 1. As amended by Revenue Regulations No. 3-2015 dated March 13, 2015.

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.