Skip to main content

Silver Goose 8 International, Inc.

BIR Ruling No. 317-19 • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Issuances • Rulings (Numbered) • May 31, 2019

Full text

May 31, 2019 BIR RULING NO. 317-19 Revenue Memorandum Order (RMO) No. 09-2014; BIR Ruling No. 007-2015; BIR Ruling No. 476-2014 Silver Goose 8 International, Inc. Unit 906 The Trade & Financial Tower 7th Avenue cor. 32nd Street Fort Bonifacio Taguig City TIN: 000-000-000-000 Attention: AAA _______________ Gentlemen : This refers to your letter dated October 12, 2016 received by this Office on October 17, 2016 requesting for confirmation of VAT exemption of your revenue/sales transaction with another subcontractor of Philippine Amusement and Gaming Corporation (PAGCOR). SCaITA In reply, please be informed that Revenue Memorandum Order (RMO) No. 9-2014 was issued to serve as a guideline in the processing of request for tax rulings and that the same took effect on February 06, 2014. (BIR Ruling No. 007-2015 dated January 20, 2015 and BIR Ruling No. 476-2014 dated November 26, 2014) Section 4 of RMO No. 9-2014 provides that letter request for ruling must be sworn and executed under oath by the individual taxpayer or by the authorized official/representative of the corporation, partnership or entity containing the following: 1. Factual background of the request for ruling; 2. Issues/questions raised or conclusions sought to be confirmed; 3. Legal grounds and relevant authorities supporting the position of the taxpayer; 4. List of documents submitted; and 5. Affirmations stating that: a. A similar inquiry has not been filed and is not pending in another office of the Bureau; b. There is no pending case in litigation involving the same issue/s and the same taxpayer and related taxpayer; c. The issue/s subject of the request is not pending investigation, on-going audit, administrative protest, claim for refund or issuance of tax credit certificate, collection proceeding or judicial appeal; and d. The documents are complete and that no other documents will be submitted in connection with the request. Moreover, Section 5 of the same RMO provides that request for ruling must be accompanied by the following: 1. All documents that are material to the transaction, certified as true copies by the appropriate government agency having custody of the original documents; 2. Proof that the taxpayer is entitled to exemption or incentive; and 3. Special Power of Attorney or authorization in writing in case the request is filed by a representative of the taxpayer. In view of the fact that your letter request was not sworn to and executed under oath; does not contain a list of submitted documents and affirmations required under Section 4 of RMO No. 9-2014; the accompanying document submitted was not certified as true copy by the public officer having custody of the original document; and was not accompanied with a Special Power of Attorney or authorization in writing that the request was filed by a representative; it cannot be processed right now as it does not conform with the requirements of RMO No. 9-2014. Be that as it may, we would be glad to process your request for a ruling when the said letter-request conforms to the said RMO. Please be guided accordingly. Very truly yours, (SGD.) CAESAR R. DULAY Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.