Transfer of Real Properties for Shares of Stock Gives Rise to Neither Gain nor Loss

June 16, 1993 BIR RULING NO. 248-93 TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTIES FOR SHARES OF STOCK GIVES RISE TO NEITHER GAIN NOR LOSS 34 (c) (2) (c) 195-93 248-93 Far Eastern Realty Development & Builders, Corp. 123 15th Avenue, Cubao Quezon City, Metro Manila Attention: Mr . Oscar L . Espinosa Corporate Secretary This refers to your letter dated February 22, 1993 requesting in effect, a confirmation of your opinion that no gain or loss is recognized on the transfer of real properties by the spouses Pedro B. Arriola and Aurelia B. Arriola to A.P. Far Eastern Realty Development & Builders Corporation, in exchange for its shares of stock pursuant to Section 34(c)(2)(c) of the Tax Code, as amended. It is represented that A.P. Far Eastern Realty Development & Builders Corporation is a domestic corporation, duly registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission with an original authorized capital stock of One Million Pesos (P1,000,000.00), divided into One Million (1,000,000) shares with a par value of One Peso (P1.00) per share; that on February 3, 1993, it increased its authorized capital stock to Twenty-Five Million Pesos (25,000,000.00), divided into Twenty-Five Million (25,000,000) shares with a par value of One Peso (P1.00) per share; that the comparative stockholders equity before and after the approval by the Securities and Exchange Commission of their application for increase in authorized capital stock are, as follows: Stockholders No. of Shares After Approval 1. Pedro B. Arriola P25,000.00 P9,025,000.00 2. Aurelia B. Arriola 30,000.00 9,050,000.00 3. Jay B. Arriola 10,000.00 10,000.00 4. Jeany B. Arriola 7,500.00 7,500.00 5. Jesse B. Arriola 3,500.00 3,500.00 6. Dennis B. Arriola 3,500.00 3,500.00 7. Beatriz B. Arriola 500.00 500.00 Total P100,000.00 P18,100,000.00 ========= =========== that after the proposed transfer, the respective subscriptions and paid-up capital stock of the transferor spouses in relation to the other stockholders are as follows: Name No. of Shares Amount Amount Subscribed Paid 1. Pedro B. Arriola 9,062,500 P9,062,500.00 P9,025,000.00 2. Aurelia B. Arriola 9,125,000 9,125,000.00 9,050,000.00 3. Jay B. Arriola 25,000 25,000.00 10,000.00 4. Jeany B. Arriola 18,750 18,750.00 7,500.00 5. Jesse B. Arriola 9,000 9,000.00 3,500.00 6. Dennis B. Arriola 9,000 9,000.00 3,500.00 7. Beatriz B. Arriola 750 750.00 500.00 Total 18,250.00 P18,250,000.00 P10,100,000.00 ======== =========== =========== that the spouses Pedro B. Arriola and Aurelia B. Arriola are the registered owners of two (2) parcels of land, without improvements, located in Quezon City, Metro Manila, and covered by Transfer Certificates of Title Nos. 63466 and 63467 of the Registry of Deeds of Quezon City; that on March 24, 1992, a Deed of Assignment of Real Estate was executed by and between the spouses Pedro B. Arriola and Aurelia B. Arriola, whereby the spouses transferred to the latter the abovementioned properties in exchange for their unpaid subscription to the capital stock of the corporation; that as a result of the above transaction, the spouses gained control of the corporation by owning at least 51% of the total voting stock of the said corporation; and that in support of your request, you submitted to this Office, the following documents: 1) Deed of Assignment of Real Estate; 2) Amended Articles of Incorporation and SEC Registration Certificate of A.P. Far Eastern Realty Development & Builders Corporation; 3) Certificate of Increase of Capital Stock; 4) Transfer Certificates of Title; 5) Tax Declaration; 6) Secretary's certification of the stockholdings and par value of the shares of stock, the percentage of ownership of the shares of stock of the Transferors and the original and historical costs of acquisition; 7) Appraisal Report reflecting the fair market value of the properties transferred; and 8) Other pertinent documents. In reply thereto, I have the honor to inform you that pursuant to Section 34, paragraph (c)(2)(c) of the Tax Code, as amended by Republic Act No. 4522 and P.D. Nos. 1705 and 1773, no gain or loss shall be recognized if property is transferred to a corporation by a person, in exchange for stocks in such a corporation of which as a result of such exchange, said person, alone or together with others, not exceeding four persons, gains control of said corporation. The term "control" shall mean ownership of stocks in a corporation possessing at least 51% of the total voting power of all classes of stocks entitled to vote. Control is determined by the amount of stocks received i.e., total subscribed, whether for property or for services by the transferor or transferors. In determining the 51% stock ownership, only those persons who transferred property for stocks in the same transaction may be counted up to a maximum of five. Accordingly, your opinion that no gain or loss shall be recognized both to the transferors and the transferee corporation on the transfer by the spouses Pedro B. Arriola and Aurelia B. Arriola of their properties in exchange for shares of stock of the transferee corporation, A.P. Far Eastern Realty Development & Builders Corporation, considering that as a consequence of the exchange the Spouses gained control of the transferee corporation, is hereby confirmed. It should be emphasized, however, that Section 34(c)(2)(c) of the Tax Code merely defers recognition of the gain or loss from such transaction, for in determining the gain or loss from a subsequent transaction of the properties or of the stocks involved in the exchange, the original or historical cost of the properties or stocks is considered. Thus, if the transferors later sell or exchange the shares of stock acquired by them in the exchange, they shall be subject to income tax on gains derived from such sale or exchange, taking into consideration that the cost basis of the shares shall be the same as the original acquisition cost or adjusted cost basis to the transferors of the properties exchanged therefor; and that the cost basis to the transferee of the properties exchanged for stocks shall be the same as it would be in the hands of the transferors [Section 34(c)(5)(a) and (b) of the Tax Code, as amended by Presidential Decree No. 1773]. In this connection, you are further advised that in order that the parties to the exchange can avail of the non-recognition of gains provided for in Section 34(c)(2)(c) of the Tax Code, as amended, they should comply with the requirements hereunder mentioned: a. The transferors must file with their income tax return for the taxable year in which the exchange transaction was consummated, a complete statement of all facts pertinent to the exchange, including: 1. A description of the properties transferred, or of their interest in such properties, with a statement of the original acquisition cost/adjusted cost basis or other basis thereof at the time of the transfer; 2. The kind of stocks received and preferences, if any; 3. The number of shares of each class received; and 4. The fair market value per share of each class at the date of the exchange. b. On the other hand, the transferee corporation must file with its income tax return for the taxable year in which the exchange was consummated, the following: 1. A complete description of the properties received from the transferors; 2. A statement of the original acquisition cost or other basis of the properties in the hands of the transferors and the adjusted cost basis thereof at the time of the transfer; and 3. Information with respect to the capital stock of the corporation, including: a. The total issued and outstanding capital stock immediately prior to and immediately after the exchange with a complete description of each class of stock; b. The classes of stocks and number of shares issued to the transferors in the exchange; and c. The fair market value as of the date of the exchange of the capital stock issued to the transferors. In addition to the foregoing requirements, permanent records in substantial form must be kept by the taxpayers participating in the exchange, showing the information listed above in order to facilitate the determination of gain or loss from a subsequent disposition of stocks/properties involved in the exchange. The parties shall also cause to be annotated on the Transfer Certificates of Title and at the back of the Certificates of Stock, the date the deed of exchange was executed, the original or historical cost of acquisition of the properties or stocks involved, and the fact that no gain or loss was recognized as a result of such exchange. Moreover, pursuant to Section 196 of the Tax Code, as amended, a conveyance, or deed whereby land is assigned or transferred to the purchaser is subject to documentary stamp tax based on the consideration of value received or contracted to be paid for such realty. A stock in a corporation is a valuable consideration for transfer of real property (Section 177, Documentary Stamp Tax Regulations). Accordingly, if a parcel of land is exchanged with stocks in a corporation, as in this case, the latter is the consideration, the value of which shall be the basis of the documentary stamp tax on the Deed of Assignment executed to effect the aforesaid transfer (BIR Ruling No. 245-00-000-00-109-82, dated April 06, 1982). The value shall be the fair market value which shall not be less than the par value of the stocks. Finally, the certificates of stocks to be issued by A.P. Far Eastern Realty Development & Builder's Corporation are, in all probability, original issues, which are subject to the documentary stamp tax imposed by Section 175 of the Tax Code, as amended. After payment of the corresponding documentary stamp tax, the real properties may be registered by the Register of Deeds concerned in the name of the transferee corporation, A.P. Far Eastern Realty Development & Builder's Corporation. This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However, if upon investigation, it will be disclosed that the facts are different, and/or any of the requirements imposed in this letter are not complied with, then this ruling shall be considered null and void. cdtech LIWAYWAY VINZONS-CHATO Commissioner of Internal Revenue