BIR Ruling No. 131-13
BIR Ruling No. 131-13 • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Issuances • Rulings (Numbered) • Apr 4, 2013
Full text
April 4, 2013 BIR RULING NO. 131-13 Section 28 (B) (5) (b); BIR Ruling No. 368-2011 Manabat Sanagustin & Co. The KPMG Center, 9/F 6787 Ayala Avenue Makati City 1226 Attention: Herminigildo G. Murakami Principal, Tax & Corporate Services Gentlemen : This refers to your letter dated November 5, 2010 requesting on behalf of your client, WAUGHCAL PTY. LIMITED, for the confirmation of your opinion that the cash dividends paid by Morray Holdings, Inc. to WAUGHCAL PTY. LIMITED based on the Board of Directors meeting held on 21 October 2010 declaring cash dividends to the stockholders of record as of 22 October 2010 and paid on 29 October 2010, is subject to preferential rate of 15% pursuant to Section 28 (B) (5) (b) of the 1997 Tax Code, as amended. TDcCIS It is represented that WAUGHCAL PTY. LIMITED ("WAUGHCAL" for brevity) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Australia with principal address at Level 12, 160 Sussex St., New South Wales, Australia; that it is not registered either as a corporation or as a partnership and has not been licensed to do business in the Philippines; and that Morray Holdings, Inc. is a domestic corporation with principal address at 7th Floor, PhilFirst Building, 6764 Ayala Avenue, Makati City. It is further represented that WAUGHCAL is the registered owner of 159,998 voting preferred shares, with par value of Php10.00 per share and representing 39.4083% outstanding shares of Morray Holdings, Inc. and that on 21 October 2010, the Board of Directors of Morray Holdings, Inc. declared cash dividends of PhP24,592,000.00 out of its retained earnings to the stockholders of record as of 22 October 2010 and that as per dividend declaration on 21 October 2010, the total amount of PhP9,334,720.00 was declared in favor of WAUGHCAL and paid on 29 October 2010. Based on the foregoing, you now request for the confirmation of your opinion that the cash dividends in the amount of to be paid by Morray Holdings, Inc. to WAUGHCAL based on the its Board of Directors resolution on 21 October 2010 declaring cash dividends to the stockholders of record as of 22 October 2010 and paid on 29 October 2010, is subject to the preferential rate of 15% pursuant to Section 28 (B) (5) (b) of the 1997 Tax Code, as amended. In support of your request, you submitted the following documents: 1) Letter request for tax exemption; 2) Original copy of Certification of Non-registration of Company dated December 22, 2010 issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission; 3) Certified true copy of Certificate Numbers 07 & 14 issued by Morray Holdings, Inc. to WAUGHCAL PTY. LIMITED; 4) Sworn Statement dated January 2, 2012 of Herminigildo G. Murakami; 5) Original copy of the Secretary Certificate dated July 26, 2011 as to the Board Resolution declaring cash dividends; and 6) Secretary's Certificates dated October 25, 2012. In reply please be informed that Section 28 (B) (5) (b) of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended, provides the following: ICTcDA "SEC. 28. Rates of Income Tax on Foreign Corporations . . . . (B) Tax on Nonresident Foreign Corporation. . . . (5) Tax on Certain Incomes Received by a Nonresident Foreign Corporation . . . . (b) Intercorporate Dividends. A final withholding tax at the rate of fifteen percent (15%) is hereby imposed on the amount of cash and/or property dividends received from a domestic corporation, which shall be collected and paid as provided in Section 57 (A) of this Code, subject to the condition that the country in which the nonresident foreign corporation is domiciled, shall allow a credit against the tax due from the nonresident foreign corporation taxes deemed to have been paid in the Philippines equivalent to twenty percent (20%) for 1997, nineteen percent (19%) for 1998, eighteen percent (18%) for 1999, and seventeen percent (17%) thereafter, which represents the difference between the regular income tax of thirty-five percent (35%) in 1997, thirty-four percent (34%) in 1998, and thirty-three percent (33%) in 1999, and thirty-two percent (32%) thereafter on corporations and the fifteen percent (15%) tax on dividends as provided in this subparagraph;" Based on the foregoing Section, dividends received by non-resident foreign corporations from a domestic corporation shall be subject to a withholding tax of 15% of the dividends received subject to the condition that the country in which the non-resident foreign corporation is domiciled shall allow a credit against the tax due from the non-resident foreign corporation, taxes deemed to have been paid in the Philippines equivalent to 20% which represents the difference between the regular tax (35%) on corporations and the tax (15%) on dividends. Thus, if the country of domicile of the recipient corporation allows as credit against the tax imposable by it an amount equivalent to 20% of the dividends remitted to corporations domiciled therein, the dividends so remitted are subject to a withholding tax at the rate of 15% only. Moreover, under Section 23AJ of the Income Tax Assessment Act of 1936 of Australia, foreign dividends received in Australia are no longer included as taxable income but are treated as exempt, in which case then, no Philippine-sourced dividend income will be subject to tax in Australia against which a tax rebate may be claimed. ( BIR Ruling No. 368-2011 dated October 5, 2011 ) ATCEIc Based on the foregoing, we confirm your opinion that the cash dividends paid to WAUGHCAL PTY. LIMITED, a company organized and existing under the laws of Australia, by Morray Holdings, Inc. in the amount of PhP24,592,000.00 based on the its Board of Directors resolution on 21 October 2010 declaring cash dividends to the stockholders of record as of 22 October 2010 and paid on 29 October 2010, are subject to 15% final withholding tax provided under the 1997 Tax Code, as amended. This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However, if upon investigation, it will be disclosed that the facts are different, then this ruling shall be considered null and void. Very truly yours, (SGD.) KIM S. JACINTO-HENARES Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.