Multi-Line Ventures Corporation
BIR Ruling No. 006-18 • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Issuances • Rulings (Numbered) • Jan 10, 2018
Full text
January 10, 2018 BIR RULING NO. 006-18 Section 32 (B) (6) (b), 1997 NIRC; BIR Ruling No. 479-2014; BIR Ruling No. 416-2012 Multi-Line Ventures Corporation F8, J. King Warehouse, Sitio Orel Banilad, Mandaue City Attention: Mr. Aurelio O. Angeles President Gentlemen : This refers to your letter dated January 23, 2016 requesting for certificate of tax exemption on the separation pay of its employees to be terminated by reason of closure as a result of continuous business losses. It is represented that Multi-Line Ventures Corporation (MLVC) is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the Philippines. It is principally engaged in the business of trading/contracting of architectural products. MLVC has a business office and warehouse located at 1620 Herman Cortes St., Banilad, Mandaue City (TIN 005-880-826-002). It also has an office situated at Km. 6, Purok 47, Ma-a Road, Roldan Village, Davao City (TIN 005-880-826-000). In a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of MLVC on December 4, 2015, through Board Resolution No. 12-17-2015, the latter resolved that the Mandaue office and warehouse be closed due to business losses and that there be absolute termination of its operations effective December 31, 2015. In the same way, through Board Resolution No. 12-22-2015, the said Board decided that the Davao office of MLVC be likewise closed due to business losses and that there be cessation of operations of the establishment on December 31, 2015. MLVC management needed to lay-off a total of forty-five (45) employees, as follows: IAETDc Name TIN 1. Lepatan, Nina TIN-403-962-574 2. Veloso, Maribel TIN-272-955-585 3. Conato, Kristina TIN-434-285-715 4. Dacles, Leonora TIN-932-143-710 5. Pangan, Ryan TIN-411-860-934 6. Zamora, Mary Grace TIN-469-555-399 7. Adlawan, Roberto TIN-301-726-090 8. Vente, Ralfie TIN-432-508-616 9. Fat, Rolly TIN-256-578-872 10. Novo, JhunLimar TIN-465-306-874 11. Potane, Maricris TIN-930-841-443 12. Ligaray, Vanessa TIN-403-962-574 13. Lovitos, Negen TIN-260-278-476 14. Buni, Jaymar TIN-268-277-206 15. Playda, Ken Jones TIN-267-802-652 16. Colon, Janet TIN-124-952-177 17. Arana, Crisanto TIN-405-487-670 18. Balane, Allan TIN-303-154-385 19. Simbajon, Mark Joseph TIN-417-675-645 20. Santiago, Shiena TIN-454-080-276 21. Casilac, Jake TIN-467-973-437 22. Marquez, Emmanuel TIN-942-521-492 23. Dela Cruz, Paul Vincent TIN-405-488-038 24. Solangoy, Calixto C. Jr. TIN-469-939-129 25. Lopez, Keith R. TIN-460-859-723 26. Engnog, Eleazar E. TIN-270-012-976 27. Lantaya, Larry T. TIN-468-256-127 28. Salang, Flordelitz TIN-936-859-247 29. Florenosos, Mae R. TIN-945-897-587 30. Fernandez, Joanna Rheasle TIN-263-330-622 31. Dipelo, Leah TIN-935-411-394 32. Navarez, Ronald TIN-940-900-892 33. Ballen, Romillo TIN-285-312-613 34. Bartolome, Gladen TIN-228-913-463 35. Esteban, Christine TIN-470-004-982 36. Ligan, Charlie TIN-936-277-107 37. Dubria, Joanne TIN-289-616-947 38. Zurita, Maria Lea TIN-259-704-942 39. Inutan, Jean Kristie TIN-412-654-202 40. Del-is, Myrna Lynn TIN-473-045-966 41. Baylon, Danilo Jr. TIN-408-097-294 42. Hernaez, Connie TIN-252-108-797 43. Samon, Daryl TIN-296-222-048 44. Pequit, Katrina TIN-940-542-569 45. Felipe, Cristyl TIN-457-727-057 In reply, please be informed that pursuant to Section 32 (B) (6) (b) of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended, any amount received by an official or employee or by his heirs from the employer as a consequence of separation of such official or employee from the service of the employer due to death, sickness or other physical disability or for any cause beyond the control of the said official or employee shall not be included in the gross income and shall be exempt from taxation under Title II of the same Tax Code. (BIR Ruling No. 416-2012 dated June 25, 2012) CTIEac The above-mentioned law requires the presence of two (2) conditions in order that the employee benefits may be granted tax exemption, namely: (1) the employee is separated from the service of the employer due to death, sickness or other physical disability or for any cause beyond the control of the said official or employee, and (2) the employer pays benefits to the official or employee or his heirs as a consequence of such separation. Submitted documents show that MLVC has already informed the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE-Region 7, Cebu City and DOLE-Regional Office XI, Davao City) thru Establishment Termination Reports stating that the afore-mentioned employees have been separated from employment due to the company's financial losses and that the said workers have been duly notified of their termination before the announced closure of MLVC. Accordingly, the separation pay to be received by the above-named employees as a result of their separation from the service is exempt from income tax and consequently from the withholding tax prescribed by Section 79 of the 1997 Tax Code, as implemented by Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 2-98, as amended by RR Nos. 6-2001 and 12-2001. Moreover, pursuant to Section 2.78.1 (A) (7) of RR 2-98, as amended, the terminal pay, i.e. , commutation and payment of monetized unused vacation leave credits not exceeding ten (10) days during the year are not subject to income tax and consequently to the withholding tax. Conversely, the cash equivalent of vacation leave exceeding ten (10) days is subject to tax. However, this same principle cannot apply to sick leave credits since an employee must actually go on sick leave to be able to avail of said leave credits. It is, however, understood that this exemption does not include the payment of the separated employees' salaries and the payment of the 13th month pay and other benefits in excess of the Php82,000.00 1 threshold under Section 2.78.1 (A) (3) (a) and (A) (7) of RR 2-98, as amended. (BIR Ruling Nos. 479-2014 dated December 3, 2014 and 416-2012 dated June 25, 2012) This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However, if upon investigation, it will be ascertained that the facts are different, then this ruling shall be considered as null and void. Very truly yours, (SGD.) CAESAR R. DULAY Commissioner of Internal Revenue Footnotes 1. As amended by Revenue Regulations No. 3-2015 dated March 13, 2015.
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.