Ms. Eufrocina B. Tarobal, CPA

January 12, 2010 BIR RULING [DA-(JV-004) 007-10] 22 (B); DA-373-2008; DA-247-2001; DA 262-2001 Ms. Eufrocina B. Tarobal, CPA 20 Pinaglabanan Extension San Juan City Madam : This refers to your letter dated August 5, 2009 requesting for confirmation of your opinion that: 1. The Joint Venture Agreement (JVA), copy of which will be annotated at the back of the title to the PROPERTY, executed by Moldex Realty, Inc., a domestic corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the Philippines, with principal business address at the 4th Floor, Moldex Building, Ligaya Street corner West Avenue, Quezon City, hereinafter referred to as the DEVELOPER; and BEATRIZ POLICARPIO, single; MARIA CECILIA POLICARPIO, single; RODANTE POLICARPIO, single; VERGINIA POLICARPIO, widow; SUSANA POLICARPIO, single; and CORAZON POLICARPIO, widow, all of legal age, Filipino citizens, and with residence and postal address at Camangyanan, Sta. Maria, Bulacan; all represented herein by their common Attorney-in-fact, ANITA POLICARPIO by virtue of the Special Power of Attorney executed on JULY 19, 2006, before Notary Public GLICERIO SAMPANA entered in the National Registry with Doc. No. 217, Page No. 45, Book No. 57, Series of 2006 referred to herein as the OWNERS, does not give rise to a taxable joint venture within the meaning of Section 22 (B) of the Tax Code, as amended. The JVA is subject only to the documentary stamp tax of P15.00 imposed on the notarial acknowledgment of the JVA under Section 188 of the Tax Code, as amended. TAcSCH 2. The allocation of the saleable lots from the PROJECT to the DEVELOPER commensurate to and in consideration of its respective contribution by way of the development of the PROPERTY referred to in the JVA, is not a taxable event, and thus, not subject to income/expanded withholding tax and/or capital gains tax, the allocation being a mere return of the capital that each of the parties has contributed to the PROJECT. 3. The contribution of the OWNERS to the PROJECT in the form of real property and the allocation of the subdivided lots among the DEVELOPER and the OWNER in exchange for their respective contributions to the PROJECT, are not subject to the (a) capital gains tax imposed under Section 24 (D) as amended but only to the documentary stamp tax of P15.00 imposed on the notarial acknowledgment under Section 188 of the same Code. The facts, as you represented, are as follows: 1. The OWNERS represent themselves to be the individual lawful and legitimate owners of each of those certain parcels of land, collectively referred to herein as the PROPERTY, situated at Brgy. Camangyanan, Sta. Maria, Bulacan with aggregate area of FOUR THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED NINETY TWO (4,192) SQUARE METERS more or less, and identified and more particularly described, as follows: Lot No. 1478-B-3-E-2 Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-522878 (M) A parcel of land (Lot 1478-B-3-E-2 of the subd. plan Psd-031423-060028 being a portion of Lot 1478-B-3-E, Psd-03-047218 LRC Rec. No.), situated in the Bo. of Camangyanan, Mun. of Sta. Maria, Prov. of Bul. . . .; containing an area of ONE THOUSAND (1000) Sq.M. . . . Lot No. 1478-B-3-D Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-522879 (M) A parcel of land (Lot 1478-B-3-D) of the subd. plan Psd-03-047218 being a portion of lot 1478 (LRC) Psd-338362 LRC Rec. No.) situated in the Bo. of Camangyanan, Mun. of Sta. Maria, Prov. of Bulacan . . ., containing an area of ONE THOUSAND (1,000) Sq.M. . . . Lot No. 1478-B-2 Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-522877 (M) A parcel of land (Lot 1478-B-2 of the subd. plan (LRC) Psd-338362, approved as a non subd. project, being a portion of Lot 1478-B, (LRC) Psd-317369, LRC Rec. No. 8509), situated in the Bo. of Camangyanan, Mun. of Sta. Maria, Prov. of Bulacan, Is. of Luzon. . . . containing an area of TWO THOUSAND (2,000) Sq.M. . . . Lot No. 1478-B-3-A-1 Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-522880 (M) A parcel of land (Lot 1478-B-3-A-1 of the subd. plan Psd-03-091795; being a portion of lot 1478-B-3-A, Psd-03-047218, LRC Rec. No.), situated in the Bo. of Camangyanan, Mun. of Sta. Maria, Prov. of Bulacan. . . . containing an area of ONE HUNDRED NINETY TWO (192) Sq.M. . . . 2. The OWNERS wish to cause the development of the PROPERTY into a residential subdivision project, referred herein as the PROJECT, and incorporated as an additional phase and integral part of METROGATE SPRING MEADOWS, referred to herein as the SUBDIVISION; cESDCa 3. The DEVELOPER, being confident of the feasibility and viability of the PROJECT, has proposed to the OWNERS to undertake the complete development of the PROPERTY, complete with all facilities and amenities compatible with the mutually agreed concept therefor; 4. Moldex Realty Marketing, Inc., ("MARKETING AGENT"), being likewise confident of the over-all marketability and salability of the PROJECT, has likewise proposed to the OWNERS to undertake the marketing and selling of all the saleable inventories that will be generated from the PROPERTY; 5. The OWNERS being cognizant of the track record and performance of both DEVELOPER and MARKETING AGENT, and having full trust and confidence in their capacity and capability, has accepted the respective proposals for the development of the PROPERTY as an integral part of the PROJECT and the marketing and sale of the individual lots therein, subject to payment of compensation as spelled out in the JVA; 6. For and in consideration of the foregoing premises, the parties have agreed and bound themselves to develop the PROPERTY and market and sell all saleable units of inventory that will be derived therefrom in a joint endeavor, with the OWNER granting unto the DEVELOPER full and irrevocable rights, power and authority to subdivide and develop the entire property into a residential subdivision project, and likewise unto the MARKETING AGENT full rights, power and authority to market and sell on an exclusive basis, all the individual lots that will be derived from the PROJECT, which rights, power and authority the DEVELOPER and MARKETING AGENT have both accepted; 7. Based on the JVA, which shall be annotated in the title to the PROPERTY, it is the intention of the parties that to cause the development of the PROPERTY, the OWNERS will be contributing in the joint venture the PROPERTY, and the DEVELOPER the required development works. The parties have agreed to share in the net saleable area by assigning and transferring individual saleable lots with an aggregate area of thirty-five per cent (35%) of the total saleable area to the OWNERS and the remaining sixty-five per cent (65%) to the DEVELOPER; 8. Immediately after the approval of the over-all subdivision plan for the PROPERTY and the verified survey report for and technical description of each lot therein by the Land Management Bureau (LMB) each of the said lots shall be individually registered with the Registry of Deeds of Meycauayan, Bulacan and titled under the name of the corresponding shareowner. All road lots and open spaces shall be titled under the joint ownership of the OWNERS and DEVELOPER to the extent of the sharing ratio stipulated in Art. IV of the JVA, Clause No. 22 thereof. The annotation on the mother title regarding the JVA shall be cancelled automatically with the generation of the titles to the individual lots resulting from the subdivision of the PROPERTY; CASaEc 9. The allocation and distribution of the individual subdivided lots to the co-venturers are mere return/distribution of their investments in the joint venture project and said transaction is not in the nature of a sale, barter, exchange and lease of goods and properties, rendering of services as defined under Section 105 of the 1997 Tax Code, as amended. Therefore, said transaction is not covered by value-added tax (VAT). However, the subsequent sale of the subdivided lots by the co-venturers to their respective customers are subject to VAT; 10. The contribution of land by the OWNERS to the PROJECT is likewise not subject to capital gains tax presumed to have been realized from the sale, exchange or other disposition of real property because there is not any transfer made in the course of business but only as capital contribution to the PROJECT; and 11. The subsequent disposition by the parties under the JVA of the lots allocated to them, and the gain that may be realized by them from such sale shall be subject to the regular income tax (in the case of the DEVELOPER) and the capital gains tax (in the case of the OWNERS). In reply, please be informed of the following: 1. The JVA, executed between Moldex Realty, Inc. as the DEVELOPER and the OWNERS, described above is an agreement between the parties to construct and fund the cost of construction of a residential subdivision project which is neither a contract of sale over real property nor an instrument which conveys title to real property. Hence, no income tax or documentary stamp tax (DST) is due upon the execution of the JVA (Section 186 of Revenue Regulations No. 26). However, the notarial acknowledgment on the JVA is subject to the DST on certification pursuant to Section 188 of the 1997 Tax Code. Section 22 (B) of the 1997 Tax Code provides: "(B) The terms corporation shall include partnerships, no matter how created or organized; joint stock companies, joint accounts (cuentas en participacion) , associations, or insurance companies, but does not include general professional partnerships and a joint venture or consortium formed for the purpose of undertaking construction projects or engaging in petroleum, coal, geothermal and other energy operations pursuant to an operating or consortium agreement under a service contract with the government. "General professional partnership" are partnerships formed by persons for the sole purpose of exercising their common profession, no part of the income of which is derived from engaging in any trade or business." acCTSE From the foregoing definition of a corporation, we confirm your opinion that the JVA executed between the parties does not give rise to a taxable joint venture. The parties to a joint venture agreement may file separate income tax returns for their net revenue for the above-mentioned project less their respective proportionate share in the joint venture expenses since the joint venture is not embraced within the meaning of the term "corporation", hence, not subject to the corporate income tax imposed under Section 27 (A) of the 1997 Tax Code. (BIR Ruling No. 002-97 dated January 14, 1997) 2. The allocation and distribution of the residential lots to the DEVELOPER and the OWNERS in accordance with their respective equity contributions as stipulated in the JVA is not subject to income tax, withholding tax or capital gains tax, since the allocation/distributions is without consideration, not in connection with a sale and constitutes mere return of capital. It is understood, however, that upon subsequent disposition by the parties under the JVA of the individual/subdivided lots allocated to them, the gain that may be realized by them from such sale will be subject to the regular income tax rate provided under Sections 24 (A), 27 (A) of the 1997 Tax Code and to the creditable withholding tax under Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 2-98, as amended, whichever is applicable. Moreover, said sale shall be subject to the DST imposed under Section 196 of the 1997 Tax Code based on the gross selling price or fair market value of the properties, whichever is higher. Furthermore, the said sale shall likewise be subject to VAT. 3. The contribution of the OWNERS to the PROJECT in the form of real property and the allocation of the subdivided lots among the DEVELOPER and OWNERS in exchange for their respective contributions, pursuant to the JVA are not subject to the capital gains tax imposed under Section 24 (D) of the 1997 Tax Code. The OWNERS did not convey or transfer their ownership or interest over their real property when they contributed the aforesaid parcel of land to the joint venture but merely pooled their resources into a common fund. The said contribution constituted their capital contribution to the joint venture project, therefore, such contribution is not a taxable event that will give rise to the payment of regular income tax, creditable withholding tax and capital gains tax because the transfer or conveyance is not the course of business but a capital contribution. (BIR Ruling No. DA 262-2001 dated November 18, 2001) This will authorize the Revenue District Officer (RDO) of the revenue district where the properties are located to issue the corresponding Certificate Authorizing Registration (CAR) and Tax Clearance Certificate (TCL) involving the transfer of the titles to the parties based on their respective allocations pursuant to the Partition Agreement, without need of the presentation of proof of payment of the expanded withholding tax, VAT and the corresponding DST. Provided, that the parties to the joint venture shall cause the Register of Deeds to annotate on the TCTs that a development project is being undertaken on the land and is the object of the joint venture between the parties, and that the afore-stated joint venture is held to be a tax-exempt entity pursuant to this Ruling issued by this Office. Provided further, that parties to the joint venture shall inform the Bureau of Internal Revenue, through the Law Division, of the fulfillment of the requirement on the distribution of the lots in accordance with the allocation ratio in the JVA. For this purpose, a compliance report of the project indicating the number of lots developed/built, the respective TCTs and the party in whose name the corresponding title was issued. aEIcHA Finally, since under the JVA the MARKETING AGENT undertakes to market the individual lots by virtue of their agreement, the marketing fees derived therefrom shall be subject to income tax imposed under Section 27 (A) of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended, and consequently, to the withholding tax imposed under RR No. 2-98, as amended, and to the VAT imposed under Section 108 of the same Tax Code. This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However, if upon investigation, it will be disclosed that the facts are different, then this ruling shall be considered null and void. Very truly yours, (SGD.) GREGORIO V. CABANTAC Deputy Commissioner