Crown Communities Holdings, Inc.
BIR Ruling [DA-(C-026) 096-09] • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Issuances • Rulings (Unnumbered) • Feb 18, 2009
Full text
February 18, 2009 BIR RULING [DA-(C-026) 096-09] 27; 98; 105; #076-89; DA-643-2007; DA-038-2006; DA-342-2008; DA-269-2008; DA(C-091)288-08 Crown Communities Holdings, Inc. Suite 101, Dacay Building No. 72 Escario Street Capito Site, Cebu City Attention: Ms. Loida D. Nacario Chief Accountant Gentlemen : This refers to your letter dated June 17, 2008 requesting for confirmation of your opinion that the payables written-off in the books of Crown Communities Holdings, Inc. is subject to income tax but not to donor's tax and value-added tax since the nature of such income is non-recurring and cannot be classified as ordinary income. Background Crown Communities Holdings, Inc. (the "Corporation") is a domestic corporation organized on December 12, 2002. Its source of revenues consists mainly of Management Fees for providing managerial and technical support services to its affiliated companies. Over the years, the Corporation had obtained non-interest bearing cash advances from one of its subsidiaries, Crown Communities (Pangasinan), Inc. ("Crown Pangasinan") which based on the unaudited records of the Corporation amounted to P37,662,072.25 as of December 31, 2007. AICTcE For the taxable year ending December 31, 2007 a portion of such advances were written off by the Corporation since upon reconciliation with Crown Pangasinan, only P33,326,125.58 was reflected in the latter's books of accounts as its outstanding due from the Corporation. Further, the afore-mentioned creditor (Crown Pangasinan) did not assert any claim against the Corporation with respect to the difference in the amount of P4,335,946.67. Consequently, the Corporation has written-off such payables in the said taxable year. The same amount was recorded in the books of accounts of the Corporation as part of the "Miscellaneous Income" and was likewise included in the Corporation's Income Statement for the same year. The total revenue of the Corporation for the taxable year ending December 31, 2007 consists of the following: Management fees P3,974,421 Miscellaneous income 6,600,000 Interest on savings deposits 3,169 Total P10,577,590 ========== Based on the foregoing, you now request confirmation of your opinion that the payables written-off in the books of the Corporation may be subject to income tax, but the same is not subject to the value-added tax notwithstanding the fact that the sum written-off was booked as additional revenues of the Corporation, since the nature of such other income is non-recurring, and it cannot be classified as ordinary income of the company in the ordinary course of trade or business; and that the creditor (Crown Pangasinan) cannot be held liable for donor's tax. In reply, please be informed that write-off or condonation of debt will not be subject to income tax if it does not result in the reduction of the taxable income of the debtor or the debtor is in a capital deficit position after the condonation. Thus, in BIR Ruling No. 076-89 dated April 17, 1989, this Office held that: CITcSH "Cancellation and forgiveness of indebtedness may amount to a payment of income, to a gift, or to a capital transaction, dependent upon the circumstances. If for example, an individual performs services for a creditor who, in consideration thereof cancels the debt, income to that amount is realized by the debtor as compensation for his services. If, however, a creditor merely desires to benefit a debtor and without any consideration therefor cancels the debt, the amount of the debt is a gift from the creditor to the debtor and need not be included in the latter's gross income. If a corporation to which a stockholder is indebted forgives the debt, the transaction has the effect of the payment of a dividend. (Sec. 50 Revenue Regulations No. 2) The waiver of interest by the banks on non-trade and trade related indebtedness of GMPI is not subject to income tax considering that the deduction of said interest as expense in prior years did not offset nor reduce the taxable income of GMPI since it was in a financial loss position even without the deduction. (See Barnhart-Marrow Consolidated v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue , 47 BTA 590) Moreover, when a creditor cancels a debt as part of a business transaction, the debtor is enriched or its net assets has been increased and, therefore, he realized taxable income ( Philippine Fiber Processing Co. v. CIR , CTA Case No. 1407 Dec. 29, 1966). However, a transaction whereby nothing of exchangeable value comes to or is received by a taxpayer does not give rise to or create taxable income. (See Dallas Transfer and Terminal Warehouse Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir. 70 F 2d 95, 13AFTR 930) Accordingly, the condonation of GMPI's indebtedness by GM-US is not subject to income tax since before and after the condonation GMPI remains insolvent, i.e., in a capital deficiency position. The condonation is likewise not subject to gift tax since there is no donative interest on the part of GM-US but solely for business consideration since Isuzu will only acquire the GMPI shares from GM-US if GMPI has a "clean" balance sheet with no outstanding liabilities except those to Isuzu. Moreover, a return to solvency due to a possible future additional capital infusion by Isuzu and/or subsequent profitability in a different taxable year will not affect the non-taxability of the condonation." In the present case, the amount of P4,335,946.67 was recorded in the books of accounts of the Corporation as "Miscellaneous Income" and was likewise included in the said Corporation's Income Statement for the same year. Consequently, the Corporation reported in its Annual Income Tax Return, the amount of P8,907,900.00 as revenues for the taxable year December 31, 2007. Due to the facts aforementioned, the Corporation is clearly not in a better financial position after the write-off or condonation. Moreover, the debtor is enriched and its net assets have been increased due to the said condonation. Accordingly, the payables written-off in the books of the Corporation are subject to income tax. In addition, Section 105 of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended by Republic Act No. 9337, provides that the phrase 'in the ordinary course of trade or business' means the regular conduct or pursuit of a commercial or an economic activity, including transactions incidental thereto. aCSDIc The facts being considered, the write-off or condonation is not subject to value-added tax notwithstanding the fact that the sum written-off was booked as additional revenue on the part of the Corporation, since the nature of such other income is non-recurring, and it cannot be classified as ordinary income of the company in the ordinary course of trade or business. Furthermore, the condonation is likewise not subject to gift tax or donor's tax on the part of the creditor (Crown Pangasinan) since there is no donative intent or interest on the part of Crown Pangasinan when it made the said condonation. (BIR Ruling Nos. DA-419-2004 dated August 4, 2004; DA-038-2006 dated February 9, 2006 and DA(C-091)288-08 dated October 13, 2008) This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However, if upon investigation, it will be disclosed that the facts are different, then this ruling shall be considered as null and void. Very truly yours, Commissioner of Internal Revenue By: (SGD.) JAMES H. ROLDAN Assistant Commissioner Legal Service
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.