Skip to main content

BIR Ruling [DA-595-06]

BIR Ruling [DA-595-06] • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Issuances • Rulings (Unnumbered) • Oct 6, 2006

Full text

October 6, 2006 BIR RULING [DA-595-06] DA 352-05 Mr. Alfonso Siy No. 42 Sto. Domingo Street Quezon City S i r : This refers to your letter dated August 4, 2006 requesting for confirmation of your opinion that the proposed transfer of the property together with the improvements thereon as well as the common areas by Altaville Development Corporation to the Altaville Homeowners Association, Inc. is exempt from capital gains tax/creditable withholding tax and the corresponding documentary stamp tax. It is represented that Altaville Development Corporation is the absolute and registered owner of a parcel of land together with the improvements thereon covered by TCT No. N-249794 issued by the Registry of Deeds for Quezon City consisting of 397.20 square meters; that the property was brought under the operation of the Condominium Act (Republic Act No. 4726), or covered into a condominium project, by virtue of a Master Deed with Declaration of Restrictions; that the building was divided into condominium units and certain portions thereof were designated as common areas; that pursuant to the provisions of Section 7(a) of the Master Deed and Section 10 of the Condominium Act, Altaville Development Corporation was established primarily to manage the condominium project and to hold title to the common areas; that in compliance with the aforesaid provisions of the Condominium Act, Altaville Development Corporation will transfer the land, improvements and the common areas above-mentioned; that a Deed of Assignment will be executed for the transfer of the said property to Altaville Homeowners Association, Inc., a non-stock, non-profit corporation duly registered with the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB); and that the transfer is necessary to comply with the requirement of the Condominium Act and the transferor did not receive any consideration thereof; In reply thereto, please be informed that since the proposed transfer of the property and the common area is without consideration and is not in connection with a sale made to the Altaville Homeowners Association, Inc., no income is generated and a fortiori, no creditable withholding tax is payable and collectible. In fact, the transfer by Altaville Development Corporation of the property and the common area is made in favor of the individual unit owners of the project, and the purpose of the assignment to the Altaville Homeowners Association, Inc. of the common areas and facilities is for its management, and for the common benefit and enjoyment of the members-unit owners. ( Section 10, R.A. No. 4726 ) HEaCcD Moreover, Section 196 of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended, provides that on all conveyances, deeds, instruments, or writings, other than grants, patents or original certificates of adjudication issued by the Government, whereby any land, tenement or other realty sold shall be granted, assigned, transferred or otherwise conveyed to the purchaser, or purchasers, or to any other person or persons designated by such purchaser or purchasers, there shall be collected a documentary stamp tax, at the rates prescribed, based on the consideration contracted to be paid for such realty or on its fair market value determined in accordance with Section 6(E) of the said Code, whichever is higher. Inasmuch as the transfer of the property and the common area and facilities to Altaville Homeowners Association, Inc. is not in connection with a sale, the same is not subject to documentary stamp tax prescribed in Section 196, supra . IN VIEW THEREOF, this Office holds that the aforesaid transfer of the property and the common area is not subject to the creditable withholding tax prescribed by Revenue Regulations No. 2-98, as amended, implementing Section 57(B) in relation to Section 27 of the Tax Code of 1997. Neither is it subject to the documentary stamp tax imposed under Section 196 of the said Code. However, the notarial acknowledgment to said deed of assignment is subject to the documentary stamp tax of P15.00 pursuant to Section 188 of the Tax Code, as amended. This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However, if upon investigation, it will be disclosed that the facts are different, then this ruling shall be considered null and void. Very truly yours, (SGD.) JAMES H. ROLDAN Assistant Commissioner Legal Service

Ask what this means for your situation

The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.