BIR Ruling [DA-416-03]

November 18, 2003 BIR RULING [DA-416-03] RMC 34-91; 43-91 047-98 dated April 14, 1998 Ms. Violeta David Paguirigan Sibul Springs, San Miguel Bulacan M a d a m : This refers to your letter dated July 8, 2003 requesting for exemption from the payment of capital gains tax relative to the Deed of Absolute Sale executed on October 24, 1975 by and between Spouses Jesus T. David and Rosario Lopez David and Violeta David Paguirigan so that title to the property can be registered in the name of the buyer, Violeta David Paguirigan. It is represented that Spouses Jesus T. David and Rosario Lopez David were the absolute and registered owners of a parcel of land together with the improvements thereon located at 2nd Street, 1549 C. Aguila, San Miguel, Manila covered by TCT No. 64428 issued by the Registry of Deeds for Manila containing an area of 148 square meters; that on October 24, 1975, a Deed of Absolute Sale was executed by Spouses Jesus T. David and Rosario Lopez David in favor of Violeta David Paguirigan for and in consideration of P56,000.00; and that due to the demands of their work they failed to register the same with the Register of Deeds for the issuance of another title in the latter's favor. In reply thereto, please be informed that Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 34-91 dated April 8, 1991 was issued primarily to stop further losses to the Bureau of Internal Revenue caused by antedating Deeds of Sale involving real properties in order to avoid the imposition of income tax or the creditable withholding tax or to reduce tax liabilities on these transactions. Henceforth, public instruments transferring real properties presented to the appropriate revenue officials beyond three (3) months from the date of notarization have been presumed as ante-dated and the tax liabilities of the parties have been determined in accordance with the rules and regulations obtaining at the time such documents were presented to the BIR. This Circular, however, was subsequently clarified by RMC No. 43-91 dated May 27, 1991 to prevent irritations between revenue officers and taxpayers due to conflicting interpretations and to achieve uniform application of the rules prescribed in RMC 43-91, the pertinent provisions of which read as follows: "In order to remove doubts as to what rules to apply and when to impose penalties for late filing of tax return and payments of tax, the following rules are hereby prescribed: aICcHA "(a) When there is only a delay in the presentation of sales document, the rules on the kind of tax, rate of tax, zonal or fair market value, obtaining at the date of notarization shall be applied but the penalties for late filing of return and payment of tax shall be imposed. There is a delay in the presentation of sales document when the taxpayer submits said document to the BIR after thirty (30) days from date of notarization. The delay could be in terms of days, months or even years. For this purpose, taxpayers have the burden of proving by the submission of other documents, such as cancelled checks, official receipts, contract to sell, or certification of the archive official, to show that there is ante-dating of public instrument. "(b) When the document is presented to the BIR after three months from date of notarization and the taxpayer cannot present additional receipts or documents to show that the same is not ante-dated, then the rules applicable at the time of the presentation of the document shall be applied but no penalty shall be imposed. It is expected that by applying the current rules, a higher tax will be collected from the taxpayer than when the old rules plus penalties had been followed." In the instant case, the submitted Deed of Absolute Sale executed on October 24, 1975 is a certified true copy of the original Deed of Absolute Sale. Furthermore, the delay in the presentation of the subject Deed of Sale to the BIR and to the Register of Deeds is not indicative of the taxpayer's desire to ante-date the transaction. Thus, the rules on the kind of tax, rate of tax, zonal or fair market value obtaining at the date of notarization on October 24, 1975 shall be applied in accordance with the provisions of RMC 34-91, as clarified by RMC 43-91. Moreover, the said transaction is subject to the regular income tax rates at the time of transaction and not to the 5% [now 6%] capital gains tax, which took effect only on September 7, 1979, subject to the corresponding penalties, interest and surcharges up to the time of payment. Thus, as of October 24, 1975, the date when the Deed of Absolute Sale was executed and notarized, the provision of the Tax Code on the 5% capital gains tax under Sec. 21(e) [now Section 24 (D) of RA No. 8424, otherwise known as the Tax Reform Act of 1997] was not yet in existence. Therefore, prior to the effectivity of BP Blg. 37, capital gains from the sale or transfer of real property classified as capital assets were then subject to the regular income tax rates. Accordingly, the subject sale of real property between the Spouses Jesus T. David and Rosario Lopez David, as sellers, and Violeta David Paguirigan, as buyer, is not subject to the 5% capital gains tax now imposed under Sec. 21(e) of the Tax Code, as amended [now under Sec. 24 (D) of RA No. 8424]. However, considering that the subject Deed of Sale does not show that it had already been subjected to the documentary stamp tax, the sellers or the buyer, in this case, should be made liable to the documentary stamp tax based on the consideration stipulated in the Deed of Sale at the rate prevailing on October 24, 1975 in accordance with Sec. 233 (now Sec. 196) of the Tax Code in relation with the provisions of RMC 43-91, viz : "(a) When the consideration, or value received or contracted to be paid for such realty, after making proper allowance of any encumbrance, exceeds P200 and does not exceed P1,000, P0.75: "(b) For each additional P1,000, or fractional part thereof in excess of P1,000 of such consideration or value, P3.00." llcd The amount of documentary stamp tax due, however, shall be subject to penalties and other charges as provided for under Commonwealth Act No. 466, the law subsisting at the time of the transaction, and any amendments thereto. IN THE LIGHT OF THE FOREGOING, the subject parcel of land which is covered by the aforesaid Deed of Absolute Sale executed on October 24, 1975 may now be issued a Certificate Authorizing Registration (CAR) or Tax Clearance Certificate (TCC) without paying the 5% capital gains tax but the same shall be subject to the ordinary income tax and to the documentary stamp tax plus the corresponding penalties and other charges thereto from the date of execution of the contract until finally paid based on the law then prevailing. (BIR Ruling No. 047-98 dated April 14, 1998) ADETca This ruling is being issued based on the foregoing representations. If upon investigation, however, it will be shown that the facts are different from the said representations, then this ruling shall be considered null and void. Very truly yours, Commissioner of Internal Revenue By: (SGD.) JOSE MARIO C. BUAG Deputy Commissioner Legal & Inspection Group