BIR Ruling [DA-036-00]
BIR Ruling [DA-036-00] • Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) Issuances • Rulings (Unnumbered) • Jan 18, 2000
Full text
January 18, 2000 BIR RULING [DA-036-00] C . M . Pancho Construction, Inc . 71-A Scout Borromeo St., Diliman Quezon City Attention: Mr . Cornelio M . Pancho President & Gen. Manager Gentlemen : This refers to your letter dated October 20, 1999 in connection with the project of the National Irrigation Administration (NIA) particularly the construction of Irrigation and Drainage Canals, Settling Basin, Pumping Station, and Related Structures with Supply, Delivery, Installation of Pumping Equipment and Steel Gates/Slide Gates at Western Area for Pampanga Delta Development Project Irrigation Component, (PDDP-IC); that the said project which is covered by Contract No. PDDPI-C-2 (Schedule I) is being financed by the Overseas Economic Cooperation Fund (OECF) under OECF Loan No. PH-123; and that the project is undertaken by the Joint Venture/Consortium of C.M. Pancho Construction Inc./Kubota Corporation/L.P. Engineering. Based on the foregoing, you now request for a ruling that the Joint Venture/Consortium of C.M. Pancho Construction, Inc./Kubota Corporation/L.P. Engineering is not subject to the 8.5% creditable VAT and also the 1% expanded withholding tax. LibLex In reply, please be informed that as amplified under Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 42-99 dated June 2, 1999, OECF Funded Projects are covered by the standard clauses of the Exchange of Notes between the Japanese Government and the Republic of the Philippines which read as follows: "The government of the Republic of the Philippines will exempt the Fund from all fiscal levies or taxes imposed in the Republic of the Philippines on and/or in connection with the Project Loan, the Engineering Service Package Loan and the Commodity Loan as well as interest accruing therefrom." "The Government of the Republic of the Philippines will, itself or through its executing agencies or instrumentalities, assume all fiscal levies or taxes imposed in the Republic of the Philippines on Japanese firms and: nationals operating as suppliers, contractors or consultants on and/or in connection with any income that may accrue from the supply of products and/or services to be provided under the Project Loan." RMC N. 42-99 established that under the first clause cited above, it is the intention of the two governments not to use the proceeds of the loan in the payment of all fiscal levies or taxes imposed by the Philippines. In view thereof, this Office held that the executing government agencies should not impose the 8.5% creditable VAT withholding prescribed under Section 114(C) of the Tax Code of 1997 for government public works contractors undertaking OCEF Funded Projects. Otherwise, the covenant not to subject the funded amount to taxes, which is the clear intent of both the Philippine and the Japanese Governments under the Exchange of Notes, might be violated. The fact that OECF funded Construction of Irrigation and Drainage Canals, Settling Basin, Pumping Station, and Related Structures with Supply, Delivery and Installation of Pumping Equipment and Steel Gates/Slide Gates at Western Area for Pampanga Delta Development Project Irrigation Component Lower Agusan and Filipino corporations will not invalidate the tax-free treatment of the fund. For that matter, even if only Filipino corporations or nationals happen to be the main contractor of the project, the same tax free treatment should prevail. Verily, the above-cited first clause of the Exchange of Notes is particularly directed towards the non-utilization of the loan amount in payment of taxes and is not dependent upon the nationality of the project contractor. Hence, this Office s of the opinion, and so holds, that the National Irrigation Administration and could properly recognize the non-imposition of the 8.5% VAT withholding to the Joint Venture/Consortium of C.M. Pancho construction, Inc./Kubota Corporation/L.P. Engineering. llcd With respect to the exemption from the 1% withholding tax, this Office has already held that, for being a joint venture or consortium formed for the purpose of undertaking construction projects, the Joint Venture/Consortium of C.M. Pancho construction, Inc./Kubota Corporation/L.P. Engineering is not considered as a taxable corporation in itself, hence gross payments by NIA to the former is not subject to the expanded withholding tax prescribed under Section 57(B) of the Tax Code of 1997 (BIR Ruling No. DA-586-98 dated December 29, 1998). However, each of the co-venturers is liable for the payment of their respective corporate income taxes under Sections 27 and 28 of the Tax Code of 1997 pertaining to the separate earnings which will derive from the above-mentioned projects. Hence, Filipino contractor performing OECF Funded Projects, such as C.M. Pancho Construction, Inc. and L.P. Engineering remain subject to income tax. But by virtue of second clause under the Exchange Notes cited above, the income tax pertaining to the project and accruing to Kubota Corporation shall be assumed by NIA, the former being a Japanese corporation doing an OECF Funded Project, thereby entitling it to the coverage of the above-cited agreement. This will therefore, serve as the notice to the National Irrigation Administration insofar as it is concerned. This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However, if upon investigation, it will be disclosed that the facts are different, then this ruling shall be considered null and void. Very truly yours, Commissioner of Internal Revenue By: (SGD.) SIXTO S. ESQUIVIAS IV Deputy Commissioner Legal and Enforcement Group
Ask what this means for your situation
The assistant quotes the passage it relies on and links the source, so you can check every figure it gives you.